Oropeza v. Wong

Filing 13

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On July 6, 2009, the court dismissed petitioner's habeas action for failure to pay the filing fee. The petitioner paid the filing fee on May 19, 2009, but due to a docketing error, the fee was not docketed until July 30, 2009. In view of this, the court sua sponte vacated the dismissal and reopened the case on August 7, 2009. (Docket No. 8.) On August 17, 2009, petitioner filed a motion to reconsider the dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee. Petitioner also requested permission to file a successive petition. Because the court has already re-opened petitioner's case, petitioner's motion to reconsider the court's dismissal (docket no. 9) and request for successive petition are DENIED as moot. This order terminates docket no. 9. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/29/09 v. ROBERT K. WONG, Warden, Respondent. / (Docket No. 9) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HECTOR ARTHUR OROPEZA, Petitioner, No. C 09-1871 RMW (PR) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER COURT'S DISMISSAL AS MOOT *E-FILED - 9/30/09* Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge Order Denying Motion to Reconsider Court's Dismissal as Moot P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.09\Oropeza871.Recon-Moot.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?