Mou v. West Valley College et al

Filing 54

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON 46 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/30/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Chin-Li Mou, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for "relief from judgment fraud and misconduct" against Defendants West Valley College and several of its employees. Given that there is no final judgment in the instant case, this Court will treat Plaintiff's motion as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's recent order denying Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. See Civil L.R. 7-9 (b); contra, Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60(b). It appears that prior to June 26, 2009, the date of the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction, Plaintiff had not seen Defendants' opposition papers because of Defendants' counsel's mistaken belief that Plaintiff had registered for electronic case filing. Notwithstanding counsel's error, which appears to have been made in good faith, Plaintiff's papers in support of the instant motion include a substantive reply to Defendant's earlier opposition papers. Accordingly, the Court will vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday, October 2, 2009 and will reconsider the merits of the Case No. C 09-1910 JF (RS) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (JFLC1) **E-Filed 9/30/2009** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CHIN-LI MOU, Plaintiff, v. WEST VALLEY COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. Case Number C 09-1910 JF (RS) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 motion for a preliminary injunction in light of Plaintiff's additional briefing. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-1(b), and in light of the fact that the Court already has heard oral argument concerning the circumstances of Plaintiff's suspension from West Valley College and subsequent administrative appeal of that suspension, the Court deems the matter appropriate for submission without further oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 30, 2009 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 Case No. C 09-1910 JF (RS) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (JFLC1) 1 2 3 4 This Order has been served upon the following persons: Chin-Li Mou 4141 Boneso Circle San Jose, CA 95134 John A. Shupe , Esq jas@bovetprofessional.com, marcia@bovetprofessional.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. C 09-1910 JF (RS) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (JFLC1)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?