"In re MagSafe Apple Power Adapter Litigation."

Filing 21

STIPULATION Stipulated Request to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order by Apple, Inc.. (Muhlbach, Andrew) (Filed on 9/18/2009)

Download PDF
Kitagawa, Jr et al v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 21 Case5:09-cv-01911-JW Document21 Filed09/18/09 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) (PPreovolos@mofo.com) ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) (AMuhlbach@mofo.com) ANNE M. HUNTER (CA SBN 221455) (AHunter@mofo.com) ALEXEI KLESTOFF (CA SBN 224016) (AKlestoff@mofo.com) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. HELEN I. ZELDES (CA SBN 220051) (helenz@zhlaw.com) ALREEN HAEGGQUIST (CA SBN 221858) (alreenh@zhlaw.com) ZELDES & HAEGGQUIST, LLP 625 Broadway, Suite 906 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/342-8000 Facsimile: 619/342-7272 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Naotaka Kitagawa, et al. 15 [Additional counsel listed on signature page.] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - CASE NO. 09-CV-01911 JW sf-2735674 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NAOTAKA KITAGAWA, JR., TIMOTHY J. BROAD and JESSE REISMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, APPLE, INC., and, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, inclusive, Defendants Case No. 09-cv-01911-JW STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER The Honorable James Ware Date: September 28, 2009 1 Case5:09-cv-01911-JW Document21 Filed09/18/09 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: WHEREAS the Case Management Conference in this case is currently scheduled for September 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS the parties' deadline for filing the Joint Case Management Conference Statement is Friday, September 18, 2009; WHEREAS a similar1 action - Tracey Hackwith, et al. v. Apple Inc., Northern District of California, San Jose Division, Case No. 09-cv-03862 RMW ("Hackwith") - was filed on May 15, 2009, in the Central District of California and was transferred to the Northern District of California on August 24, 2009;2 WHEREAS on September 4, 2009, Apple Inc. ("Apple") filed an administrative motion ("Apple's Motion") to consider whether the Hackwith case should be related to this action pursuant to Local Rule 3-12; WHEREAS on September 10, 2009, the Hackwith plaintiffs filed a Notice of NonOpposition to Apple's Motion;3 WHEREAS Apple's Motion is pending; and WHEREAS if the two cases are deemed related, it would serve the interests of judicial economy if all parties in both cases participated in the Rule 26(f) meet and confer, contributed to the Joint CMC statement, and attended the Case Management Conference; Apple does not by this Stipulation concede any of the factual allegations of the cases or that certification of the putative classes is proper under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 23. Judge Fairbank of the Central District of California granted Apple's motion to transfer the Hackwith case to the Northern District of California on August 12, 2009; the case was transferred on August 24, 2009. 3 2 1 Counsel for the Hackwith plaintiffs filed their Notice of Non-Opposition in the Hackwith docket. STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER- CASE NO. 09-CV-01911 JW sf-2735674 2 Case5:09-cv-01911-JW Document21 Filed09/18/09 Page3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an order continuing the Case Management Conference in the Kitagawa matter, currently scheduled for September 28, 2009, until October 19, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Dated: September 18, 2009 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH ANNE M. HUNTER ALEXEI KLESTOFF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach Andrew D. Muhlbach Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: September 18, 2009 ZELDES & HAEGGQUIST, LLP By: /s/ Helen I. Zeldes Helen I. Zeldes Attorneys for Plaintiffs STEVEN A. SKALET (admitted pro hac vice) CRAIG L. BRISKIN (admitted pro hac vice) MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. Dated: September 18, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 23 24 By: 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER- CASE NO. 09-CV-01911 JW sf-2735674 /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach Andrew D. Muhlbach Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 3 Case5:09-cv-01911-JW Document21 Filed09/18/09 Page4 of 4 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: ________________________ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ Hon. James Ware United States District Judge STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER- CASE NO. 09-CV-01911 JW sf-2735674 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?