Hodges v. Akeena Solar, Inc. et al
Filing
6
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION RE:CONSOLIDATION OF RELATED CASES re 5 Stipulation. The Court declines to adopt the parties' Stipulation as premature. Once there are identifiable cases that the parties believe are related, they may file formal motions to relate and to consolidate when appropriate. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/16/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sharon Hodges, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 09-02147 JW ORDER DENYING STIPULATION RE: CONSOLIDATION OF RELATED CASES
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Akeena Solar, Inc., et al., Defendants. /
Presently before the Court is the parties' Stipulation re: Consolidation of Related Cases and Extending Time to Respond. (Docket Item No. 5.) The parties seek to preemptively consolidate all related cases into this action. The parties, however, do not identify any such cases, nor do they seek to formally relate or consolidate any specified additional actions. Accordingly, the Court declines to adopt the parties' Stipulation as premature. Once there are identifiable cases that the parties believe are related, they may file formal motions to relate and to consolidate when appropriate.
Dated: June 16, 2009
JAMES WARE United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Arthur L. Shingler ashingler@scott-scott.com Benjamin Matthew Crosson bcrosson@wsgr.com David R. Scott drscott@scott-scott.com Mary K. Blasy maryb@scott-scott.com
Dated: June 16, 2009
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?