Litmon v. Santa Clara County et al

Filing 18

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 9/5/09 On August 6, 2009, defendant Stephen Mayberg moved for summary judgment on all claims of Plaintiff David Litmon's ("Litmon") complaint. Litmon now requests an enlargement of time in which to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Counsel for Mayberg has represented to the court that Mayberg does not oppose the enlargement of time. The court therefore grants Litmon's request. Litmon shall file his opposition to Mayberg's motion for summary judgment by January 8, 2010, and the hearing, presently set for October 16, 2009, is hereby continued to January 29, 2010. v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY; STEPHEN MAYBERG - DIRECTOR, Defendants. DAVID LITMON, JR, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME [Re Docket No. 14] No. C-09-02158 RMW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 9/5/09 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME--No. C-09-02158 RMW JAS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: David Litmon, Jr. 32314 Ruth Court Union City, CA 94587 PRO SE Counsel for Defendants: Stephen H. Schmid Thomas A. Blake stephen.schmid@cco.co.santa-clara.ca.us tom.blake@doj.ca.gov Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 9/5/09 JAS Chambers of Judge Whyte ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME--No. C-09-02158 RMW JAS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?