Vathana v. EverBank et al

Filing 164

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 163 to Modify Hearing Date for Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing previously set for 9/24/2015 Continued to 10/1/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/10/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL MILLEN (SBN 151731) mikemillen@aol.com 2 119 Calle Marguerita, Ste. 100 Los Gatos, CA 95032 3 Tel: (408) 871-0777 Fax: (408) 516-9861 4 Attorney for Plaintiff Ek Vathana 5 LAURA A. STOLL (SBN 255023) 6 lstoll@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 7 601 S. Figueroa Street, 41st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 8 Tel.: 213.426.2500 Fax: 213.623.1673 9 DEBORAH S. BIRNBACH (pro hac vice) 10 dbirnbach@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 11 Exchange Place Boston, MA 02109 12 Tel.: 617.570.1000 Fax: 617.523.1231 13 Attorneys for Defendants EverBank a/k/a 14 EverBank Direct a/k/a EverBank Federal Savings Association, EverBank Financial 15 Corp. and EverBank World Markets 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 17 18 EK VATHANA, individually and on behalf of 19 all others similarly situated, 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. 22 EVERBANK, etc. 23 Case No. 09-CV-02338-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND [PROP ] ORDER TO MODIFY HEARING DATE Case No 09-CV-02338-RS Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Plaintiff Ek 1 2 Vathana (“Vathana”) and defendants EverBank a/k/a EverBank Direct a/k/a EverBank Federal 3 Savings Association, EverBank Financial Corp. and EverBank World Markets (collectively, 4 “EverBank”) (together, the “Parties”) agree and stipulate as follows: 1. 5 On August 5, 2015, the parties submitted a stipulation to extend the briefing 6 schedule for Vathana’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 161). 2. 7 On August 5, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to modify the existing 8 brief schedule. The Court also, sua sponte, continued the hearing to September 24, 2015 at 1:30 9 p.m. (ECF No. 162). 3. 10 Counsel for EverBank is scheduled to be out of the country on September 24, 2015, 11 and is therefore unable to attend the hearing currently scheduled for September 24, 2015. 4. 12 Counsel for Vathana has agreed to moving the hearing date to October 1, 2015 at 13 1:30 p.m. 14 5. The parties are informed that the Court is available on October 1, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. 15 NOW, WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, the 16 hearing for the Vathana’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is moved to October 1, 2015 at 17 1:30 p.m. 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 STIP AND [PROP ] ORDER TO MODIFY HEARING DATE Case No 09-CV-02338-RS 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 Dated: August 7, 2015 By: 4 5 6 __________________________________ MICHAEL MILLEN mikemillen@aol.com 119 Calle Marguerita, Ste 100 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Tel. 408.871.0777 Fax. 408.866.7480 7 Attorney for Plaintiff: Ek Vathana 8 9 10 Dated: August 7, 2015 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Deborah S. Birnbach __________________________________ DEBORAH S. BIRNBACH dbirnbach@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Exchange Place Boston, MA 02109 Tel.: 617.570.1000 Fax: 617.523.1231 LAURA A. STOLL lstoll@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 601 S. Figueroa Street, 41st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel.: 213.426.2500 Fax: 213.623.1673 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants: EverBank a/k/a EverBank Direct a/k/a EverBank Federal Savings Association; EverBank Financial Corp. and EverBank World Markets 19 20 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 DATED: _________________, 2015 8/10 25 _______________________________ HON. RICHARD SEEBORG U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 2 STIP AND [PROP ] ORDER TO MODIFY HEARING DATE Case No 09-CV-02338-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?