Cleveland v. Isabella's At Wharfside, Inc. et al
Filing
99
STIPULATION AND ORDER 98 of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendants. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/18/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
FRANK R. UBHAUS, CA STATE BAR NO. 46085
BERLINER COHEN
TEN ALMADEN BOULEVARD
ELEVENTH FLOOR
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95113 2233
TELEPHONE: (408) 286 5800
FACSIMILE: (408) 998 5388
frank.ubhaus@berliner.com
5
6
7
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS ISABELLA’S AT
WHARFSIDE, INC., TENE SHAKE, FISHERMAN’S WHARF
COMPANY, LP, CHRIS SHAKE, WHARFSIDE
RESTAURANT, INC., ANTHONY J. PALMA, NATALIE
PALMA, AND PALMA/WHARFSIDE LTD
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
TIMOTHY CLEVELAND,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CASE NO. C09 2376 RMW (PSG)
STIPULATION AND ORDER
OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS
ISABELLA’S AT WHARFSIDE, INC., DBA
ISABELLA’S RESTAURANT; TENE
SHAKE; CITY OF MONTEREY;
FISHERMAN’S WHARF COMPANY, LP;
CHRIS SHAKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND
DBA FISHERMAN’S WHARF COMPANY,
LP; WHARFSIDE RESTAURANT, INC.;
ANTHONY J. PALMA, INDIVIDUALLY
AND DBA WHARFSIDE RESTAURANT;
NATALIE PALMA, INDIVIDUALLY AND
DBA WHARFSIDE RESTAURANT;
SALVATORE RAPPA, INDIVIDUALLY
AND DBA WHARFSIDE RESTAURANT; J.
PALMA/WHARFSIDE, LTD. BY
PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY CLEVELAND
v.
ISABELLA’S AT WHARFSIDE, INC., dba
ISABELLA’S RESTAURANT; TENE
SHAKE; CITY OF MONTEREY;
FISHERMAN’S WHARF COMPANY, LP;
CHRIS SHAKE, individually and dba
FISHERMAN’S WHARF COMPANY, LP;
WHARFSIDE RESTAURANT, INC.;
ANTHONY J. PALMA, individually and dba
WHARFSIDE RESTAURANT; NATALIE
PALMA, individually and dba WHARFSIDE
RESTAURANT; SALVATORE RAPPA,
individually and dba WHARFSIDE
RESTAURANT; JOSEPHINE RAPPA
individually and dba WHARFSIDE
RESTAURANT; PALMA/WHARFSIDE,
LTD. ; and DOES 1 10, inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24
25
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2012, the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte ordered attorneys fees and
26
costs to be awarded to Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland as the prevailing party in the above entitled
27
Case No. C09 2376 RMW, and whereas those fees and costs have been paid by Defendants and
28
CASE NO. C09 2376 RMW (PSG)
\FRU\1044915.3
060412 09800022
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
received by Plaintiff’s counsel before May 5, 2012, in full satisfaction of the March 14, 2012
2
Court Order and by agreement of the parties.
3
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the
4
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland, Defendants Isabella’s at
5
Wharfside, Inc., dba Isabella’s Restaurant, Tene Shake,, Fisherman’s Wharf Company, LP, Chris
6
Shake, individually and dba Fisherman’s Wharf Company, LP; Wharfside Restaurant, Inc.;
7
Anthony J. Palma, individually and dba Wharfside Restaurant; Natalie Palma, individually and
8
dba Wharfside Restaurant; Palma/Wharfside, Ltd.,(“The Isabella defendants”), and the City of
9
Monterey that, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil
10
Procedure, this action and all claims stated within this action should be dismissed with prejudice.
11
SO STIPULATED:
12
STUBBS & LEONE
13
DATED:
JUNE 4, 2012
14
BY: /S/ CLAUDIA LEED
CLAUDIA LEED
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT THE CITY OF
MONTEREY
15
16
17
18
BERLINER COHEN
DATED:
JUNE 4, 2012
19
BY: /S/ FRANK R. UBHAUS
FRANK R. UBHAUS
MARY KATHARINE WILSON
ATTORNEYS FOR THE ISABELLA
DEFENDANTS.
20
21
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
CASE NO. C09 2376 RMW (PSG)
\FRU\1044915.3
060412 09800022
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
LAW OFFICE OF PAUL L. REIN
DATED: MAY 16, 2012
2
BY: _/S/ PAUL L. REIN
PAUL L REIN
CELIA MCGUINNESS
CATHERINE M. CABALO
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
TIMOTHY CLEVELAND
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED
7
Dated:
8
9
RONALD M. WHYTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. C09 2376 RMW (PSG)
\FRU\1044915.3
060412 09800022
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?