ZL Technologies, Inc. v. Gartner Group, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (approving 18 ). The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss set for 9/25/2009 is CONTINUED to 10/23/2009 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/31/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W KERR ญญญญญ & ญญญญญ LLP JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (95535) MICHAEL NG (237915) KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105ญ1528 Telephone: (415) 371-8500 Fax: (415) 371-0500 Attorneys for Plaintiff ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. **E-Filed 9/1/2009** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. GARTNTER, INC. and CAROLYN DiCENZO, Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-02393-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ----------------ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Date: September 25, 2009 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: Courtroom 3, 5th Floor Judge: Jeremy Fogel AGSTAFFE Case No. 09-CV-02393-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W KERR ญญญญญ & ญญญญญ LLP ------------------ ORDER [PROPOSED] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss currently scheduled for Friday, September 25, 2009 is continued to Friday, October 23, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The deadline for Plaintiff to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be September 18, 2009, and the deadline for Defendants to file and serve their reply thereto shall be October 9, 2009. 9/1/2009 DATED: ________________ _________________________________________ Hon. Jeremy Fogel UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ญ2ญ Case No. 09-CV-02393-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AGSTAFFE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?