in re Jacqueline C. Melcher aka Jacqueline Carlin
ORDER dismissing appeal. Signed by Judge Whyte on 3/12/10. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL CCL --No. C-09-02444 RMWNo. C-09-02445 RMWNo. C-09-02446
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
In re JACQUELINE MELCHER BANKRUPTCY APPEALS
No. C-09-02444 RMW No. C-09-02445 RMW No. C-09-02446 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
The instant bankruptcy appeal was transferred to this court on June 3, 2009. On November 24, 2009, the court granted appellant Jacqueline C. Melcher's motion to designate the record on appeal and to file electronically as a person in pro per. No action has been taken on the matter since. On February 9, 2010, the court issued an order to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court finds that appellant has failed to show good cause for failure to diligently prosecute and therefore dismisses the appeal.
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Notice of this document has been sent to: Appellant: Jacqueline C. Melcher P.O. Box 222798 Carmel, CA 93922 Counsel for Appellee: Charles Patrick Maher Michael Alan Isaacs Counsel for Trustee: Nanette Dumas Nanette.Dumas@USDOJ.gov firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
CCL Chambers of Judge Whyte
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL CCL
--No. C-09-02444 RMWNo. C-09-02445 RMWNo. C-09-02446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?