The Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. Salazar

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time For Intervenor-Defendants Napa, Sonoma, and Lake Counties to File Responsive Pleadings to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint re 53 Stipulation. Response due 7/16/2010. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/17/210. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT WESTMEYER #54791 County Counsel THOMAS S. CAPRIOLA #251472 Deputy County Counsel County of Napa 1195 Third Street Suite 301 Napa, California 94559 Telephone: (707) 259-8251 Fax: (707) 259-8220 Thomas.Capriola@countyofnapa.org Attorneys for Proposed Intervenor-Defendant County of Napa UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MISHEWAL WAPPO TRIBE OF ALEXANDER VALLEY, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH SALAZAR, in his capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Defendant, COUNTY OF NAPA, CALIFORNIA, Intervenor-Defendant, COUNTY OF SONOMA, CALIFORNIA, Intervenor-Defendant, COUNTY OF LAKE, CALIFORNIA, Intervenor-Defendant. Case No. 5:09-cv-02502-JW Hon. James Ware STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR INTERVENORDEFENDANTS NAPA, SONOMA, AND LAKE COUNTIES TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. Ken Salazar, No. 5:09-cv-02502-JW Stipulation And Proposed Order Extending Time For Intervenor-Defendants Napa, Sonoma, And Lake Counties To File Responsive Pleadings To Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley, Defendant Kenneth Salazar, and Intervenor-Defendants County of Napa, County of Sonoma, and County of Lake hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Subject to approval of this Stipulation by the Court, the date for Intervenor-Defendants County of Napa, County of Sonoma, and County of Lake to file their responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended to July 16, 2010. SO STIPULATED: FOR THE PLAINTIFF DATED: June 14, 2010 /s/ Joseph L. Kitto [Concurrence obtained per General Order 45.X] JOSEPH L. KITTO 1801 Gibson Blvd. SE unit 1114 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 Tel: (505) 977-3079 Email: KITTO@SOVSYS.NET FOR THE DEFENDANT DATED: June 15, 2010 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division /s/ David B. Glazer [Concurrence obtained per General Order 45.X] DAVID B. GLAZER Natural Resources Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: (415) 744-6491 Fax: (415) 744-6476 E-mail: David.Glazer@usdoj.gov Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. Ken Salazar, No. 5:09-cv-02502-JW Stipulation And Proposed Order Extending Time For Intervenor-Defendants Napa, Sonoma, And Lake Counties To File Responsive Pleadings To Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 15, 2010 DATED: June 11, 2010 DATED: June 14, 2010 DATED: June 11, 2010 FOR INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT ­ COUNTY OF NAPA /s/ Thomas S. Capriola THOMAS S. CAPRIOLA County of Napa Office of the County Counsel 1195 Third Street, Suite 301 Napa, CA 94559 (707) 259-8251 (707) 259-8220 (fax) thomas.capriola@countyofnapa.org FOR INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT ­ COUNTY OF SONOMA /s/ Jeffrey M. Brax JEFFREY M. BRAX [Concurrence obtained per General Order 45.X] County of Sonoma Office of the Sonoma County Counsel 575 Administration Drive, Room 105A Santa Rosa, CA 95402 (707) 565-2421 jbrax@sonoma-county.org FOR INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT ­ COUNTY OF LAKE /s/ Anita L. Grant ANITA LOUISE GRANT [Concurrence obtained per General Order 45.X] County of Lake Office of County Counsel, Courthouse 255N. Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 707-263-2321 707-263-0702 (fax) anitag@co.lake.ca.us ROBERT WESTMEYER, County Counsel /s/ Thomas S. Capriola THOMAS S. CAPRIOLA, Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for County of Napa 3 Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. Ken Salazar, No. 5:09-cv-02502-JW Stipulation And Proposed Order Extending Time For Intervenor-Defendants Napa, Sonoma, And Lake Counties To File Responsive Pleadings To Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 15, 2010 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in this filing for the signature of Plaintiff's counsel, Defendant's counsel, Intervenor-Defendant County of Sonoma's counsel, and IntervenorDefendant County of Lake's counsel indicated by a "conformed" signature ("/s/") within this e-filed document. /s/ Thomas S. Capriola County of Napa Office of the County Counsel 1195 Third Street, Suite 301 Napa, CA 94559 (707) 259-8251 (707) 259-8220 (fax) thomas.capriola@countyofnapa.org Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. Ken Salazar, No. 5:09-cv-02502-JW Stipulation And Proposed Order Extending Time For Intervenor-Defendants Napa, Sonoma, And Lake Counties To File Responsive Pleadings To Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon consideration of the foregoing Stipulation, good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Stipulation is approved; and 2. Intervenor-Defendants County of Napa, County of Sonoma, and County of Lake have until July 16, 2010 to file their responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. SO ORDERED. DATED: June 17, 2010 ________________________________ JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. Ken Salazar, No. 5:09-cv-02502-JW Stipulation And Proposed Order Extending Time For Intervenor-Defendants Napa, Sonoma, And Lake Counties To File Responsive Pleadings To Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?