O'Haire v. Napa State Hospital et al

Filing 60

ORDER Instructing Parties to File Responses. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/29/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2010)

Download PDF
O'Haire v. Napa State Hospital et al Doc. 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 *E-FILED - 7/29/10* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAUL D. O'HAIRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et. al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-2508 RMW (PR) ORDER INSTRUCTING PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES Plaintiff, a Napa State Hospital patient1 proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, the Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA"), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, concerning the conditions of his confinement at Napa State Hospital. Pending before the court are defendants' motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (docket no. 41) and motion to quash service (docket no. 54). Within 30 days of the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file responses to defendants' motions listed above. Defendants shall file replies within 15 days thereafter. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 7/29/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge On August 26, 1999, plaintiff was admitted to Napa State Hospital ("NSH") pursuant to California Penal Code 1026, based upon a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity in Alameda Superior Court. Order Instructing Parties to File Responses P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.09\OHaire508supp.wpd Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?