Ciampi v City of Palo Alto, et al

Filing 140

ORDER re 139 Permitting Defendants to File Separate Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence. Signed by Judge Koh on 4/4/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)

Ciampi v City of Palo Alto, et al

Doc. 140

1 2 3 4 5

Steven A. Sherman, Esq. Bar No. 113621 FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN A Professional Corporation 1631 East 18th Street Santa Ana, California 92705-7101 [phone] Telephone [phone] Facsimile [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF PALO ALTO, a government entity; ) LYNNE JOHNSON, an individual; CHIEF ) DENNIS BURNS, an individual; OFFICER ) KELLY BURGER, an individual; OFFICER ) MANUEL TEMORES, an individual; OFFICER ) APRIL WAGNER, an individual; AGENT DAN ) RYAN; SERGEANT NATASHA POWERS, ) individual, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ )

JOSEPH CIAMPI,

NO. C09-02655 LHK (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER re DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO FILE SEPARATE FROM THEIR REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCE or ALTERNATIVELY, FILE AN OVERSIZED BRIEF

Upon a showing of good cause, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. Defendants may file their evidentiary objections to Plaintiff's Opposition to

Motion for Summary Judgment separate and apart from their Reply. Defendants' objections may not exceed 5 pages. 4 DATED: April ___, 2011 _______________________________ Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

09-002
Dockets.Justia.com