Ciampi v City of Palo Alto, et al

Filing 82

FURTHER ORDER re Defendants' Request for Clarification. Hearing Continued to 11/23/10. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 11/12/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 11/12/2010)

Ciampi v City of Palo Alto, et al

Doc. 82

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 See, CIVIL L.R. 7-3(d) (prohibiting parties from filing such supplementary material without leave of court). ORDER, page 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JOSEPH CIAMPI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF PALO ALTO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 09-2655 LHK (PVT) ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION (Re: Docket No. 71)

On November 12, 2010, Defendants filed the Declaration of Andrew Hinz in Opposition to Motion for Order to Compel Defendants and Defendant Burns to Produce and Provide Discovery. Although the Defendants failed to obtain leave of court to file this post-reply declaration1 the court is inclined to consider the declaration in connection with Plaintiff's motion. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to the Hinz Declaration no later than November 18, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff's motion to compel is CONTINUED to November 23, 2010. Dated: 11/12/10 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 2 /s/ Donna Kirchner OSCAR RIVERA Courtroom Deputy for copies mailed on 11/12/10 Joseph Ciampi P.O. Box 1681 Palo Alto, CA 94302 to: Counsel automatically notified of this filing via the court's Electronic Case Filing system.