Pravin et al v. Wipro, Inc.

Filing 108

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DEFENDANT WIPRO, INC.'S CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/7/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011)

Pravin Jain et al v. Wipro, Inc.

Doc. 108

*E-Filed 4/8/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Professional Corporation San Jose

MICHAEL J. IOANNOU (SBN 95208) LITA M. VERRIER (SBN 181183) DANIEL P. McKINNON (SBN 234749) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113-2429 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]; [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant WIPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PRAVIN JAIN, RANDY HOLTHAUS, DILIP KUKREJA, MARK WARNER and DOUGLAS TANNER, Plaintiffs, v. WIPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

CASE NO. 5:09-cv-02743 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DEFENDANT WIPRO, INC.'S CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Date: April 21, 2011 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor The Honorable Richard Seeborg

Based upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief to file documents under seal filed on March 25, 2011 (Docket No. 73), the Declaration of Michael J. Ioannou in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Administrative Relief to File Documents Under Seal filed April 4, 2011, and FOR GOOD CAUSE shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief to File Documents Under Seal is GRANTED and Plaintiffs shall file under seal the following: · Exhibit 6 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011;
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief ­ Case No. 5:09-cv-02743 RS

RC1/5944552.1/KS2

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Professional Corporation San Jose

· · · · · ·

Exhibit 7 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011; Exhibit 14 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011; Exhibit 15 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011; Exhibit 20 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011; Exhibit 40 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011; Exhibit 43 attached to the Declaration of Daniel J. Walker in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed March 25, 2011.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4/7 Dated: ___________________, 2011 _________________________________________ The Honorable Richard Seeborg Judge, United States District Court

-2RC1/5944552.1/KS2

[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief ­ Case No. 5:09-cv-02743 RS