Pravin et al v. Wipro, Inc.

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE. Jury Selection set for 5/9/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 5/9/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Pretrial Conference set for 4/28/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/14/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010)

Download PDF
Pravin Jain et al v. Wipro, Inc. Doc. 51 *E-Filed 12/15/10* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:09-CV-02743 RS [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation To Modify Case Schedule Dockets.Justia.com STEPHEN E. MORRISSEY (187865) SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029 Telephone: (310) 789-3100 Fax: (310) 789-3150 Email: smorrissey@susmangodfrey.com DANIEL J. WALKER (admitted pro hac vice) SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Telephone: (206) 516-3880 Fax: (206) 516-3883 Email: dwalker@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PRAVIN JAIN, RANDY HOLTHAUS, DILIP KUKREJA, MARK WARNER, and DOUGLAS TANNER, Plaintiffs, vs. WIPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Defendants. Case No.: 5:09-cv-02743-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE 1382419v1/011249 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs Pravin Jain, Randy Holthaus, Dilip Kukreja, Mark Warner, and Douglas Tanner (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Wipro, Inc. ("Wipro") agree as follows: The parties have been working diligently to complete discovery before the current January 12, 2011 deadline for non-expert discovery set forth in the modified Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on September 10, 2010 ("Scheduling Order") (Docket No. 33). This discovery includes depositions of several key witnesses located in India. The parties agreed to take the depositions of the India-based witnesses during the week of January 10, 2011, but two of the witnesses, Suresh Vaswani and Suresh Senapaty, subsequently became unavailable for that week. To accommodate the witnesses' schedules and leave sufficient time for trial preparation, the parties agreed to continue the pre-trial and trial dates if the parties would commit to make its witnesses, including Mr. Vaswani and Mr. Senapaty, available during the week of February 7, 2011. Consequently, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Wipro, through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, that, to the extent allowed by the Court's calendar, the dates set forth in the Scheduling Order be modified as follows: Close of Non-Expert Discovery Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures Defendant's Expert Disclosures Further Case Management Conference Close of Expert Discovery Meet and Confer re Pretrial Conference Pretrial Motions Heard No Later Than Submit Pretrial Statements Final Pre-Trial Conference Jury Trial Begins February 28, 2011 March 7, 2011 March 18, 2011 March 24, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. April 4, 2011 April 7, 2011 April 18, 2011 April 18, 2011 April 28, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. May 2, 2011 1 Case No. 5:09-CV-02743 RS [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation To Modify Case Schedule 1382419v1/011249 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 14, 2010 SUSMAN GODFREY LLP By: /s/ Stephen E. Morrissey Stephen E. Morrissey (187865) 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029 (310) 789-3100 (310) 789-3150 (fax) Email: smorrissey@susmangodfrey.com Daniel J. Walker (admitted pro hac vice) SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 (206) 516-3880 (206) 516-3883 (fax) Email: dwalker@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: December 14, 2010 MICHAEL J. IOANNOU DANIEL P. MCKINNON ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY By: /s/ Michael J. Ioannou (with permission) Michael J. Ioannou Attorneys for Defendant Wipro, Inc. I, Stephen E. Morrissey, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this [proposed] order re stipulation to modify case schedule. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that the other signatory has concurred in this filing. Dated: December 14, 2010 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. By: /s/ Stephen E. Morrissey STEPHEN E. MORRISSEY Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pravin Jain, Randy Holthaus, Dilip Kukreja, Mark Warner, And Douglas Tanner 2 Case No. 5:09-CV-02743 RS [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation To Modify Case Schedule 1382419v1/011249 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12/14/10 Dated: ______________, 2010 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the dates set forth in the modified Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on September 10, 2010 ("Scheduling Order") (Docket No. 33) be modified as follows: Close of Non-Expert Discovery Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures Defendant's Expert Disclosures Further Case Management Conference Close of Expert Discovery Meet and Confer re Pretrial Conference Dispositive Pretrial Motions Heard No Later Than Submit Pretrial Statements Final Pre-Trial Conference Jury Trial Begins February 28, 2011 March 7, 2011 March 18, 2011 March 24, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. April 4, 2011 April 7, 2011 April 18, 2011 April 7, 2011 April 18, 2011 April 28, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. May 2, 2011 May 9, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties make their India-based witnesses, Sanjeesh Gupta, Deepak Chandran, Bipin Paracha, Krishnan Subramanian, Neeraj Jaitley, Dilip Kukreja, Rhagavendran Swaminathan, Suresh Vaswani, Indroneel Dutt, and Suresh Senapaty, available for deposition the week of February 7, 2011. By: Honorable Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 Case No. 5:09-CV-02743 RS [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation To Modify Case Schedule 1382419v1/011249

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?