Universal Grading Service et al v. EBay, Inc. et al

Filing 117

STIPULATION AND ORDER 116 to Continue Motion Hearing Dateon Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint: Motion Hearing set for 4/9/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/11/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2010)

Download PDF
*E-FILED - 3/11/10* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNIVERSAL GRADING SERVICE, JOHN CALLANDRELLO, JOSEPH KOMITO and VADIM KIRICHENKO individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. eBAY, INC., a foreign corporation, AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION, a foreign non-profit association, and PROFESSIONAL NUMISMATISTS GUILD, INC., a foreign corporation, BARRY STUPPLER & COMPANY, LLC., BARRY STUPPLER Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-02755-RMW STIPULATION AND ORDER Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, that: 1. The Court will hear Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend their Complaint on April 9, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.; IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 9, 2010 MARINA TRUBITSKY & ASSOCIATES /s/ Marina Trubitsky __________________________________ By: Marina Trubitsky, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNIVERSAL GRADING SERVICE, JOHN CALLANDRELLO, JOSEPH KOMITO and VADIM KIRICHENKO COOLEY GODWARD KRONICH LLP /s/ Ben Chapman _________________________________ By: Benjamin Chapman Attorneys for Defendant EBAY INC. ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY /s/ Jung H. Park __________________________________ Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION COLE, SCOTT A' KISSANE, P.A. /s/ Robert E. O'Quinn ____________________________________ Attorneys for Defendant PROFESSIONAL NUMISMATICS GUILD, INC. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/11 Dated: ____________, 2010 _________________________________________ HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?