Universal Grading Service et al v. EBay, Inc. et al

Filing 154

STIPULATION AND ORDER 153 Setting Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 7/22/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/6/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)

Download PDF
Universal Grading Service et al v. EBay, Inc. et al Doc. 154 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN DIEGO *E-FILED - 4/6/11* UNIVERSAL GRADING SERVICE, JOHN CALLANDRELLO, JOSEPH KOMITO and VADIM KIRICHENKO, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. eBAY, INC., a foreign corporation, AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION, a foreign non-profit association, and PROFESSIONAL NUMISMATISTS GUILD, INC., a foreign corporation, BARRY STUPPLER & COMPANY, LLC., Defendants. Case No. C 09 02755 RMW (HRL) STIPULATION & ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 STIPULATION CASE NO. C 09 02755 RMW (HRL) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN DIEGO Plaintiffs Universal Grading Service, John Callandrello, Joseph Komito, and Vadim Kirichenko ("Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and Defendants eBay Inc. and Professional Numismatists Guild, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), on the other hand, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on March 8, 2011, the Court granted Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and gave Plaintiffs twenty days to file a Fourth Amended Complaint (Docket No. 151); WHEREAS, on March 28, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their Fourth Amended Complaint (Docket No. 152); WHEREAS the Parties have taken into account the Parties' and their respective counsels' holiday schedules and other substantive trial/hearing dates in agreeing to the proposed briefing schedule; WHEREAS, the Parties desire to set a briefing schedule and a hearing date for Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the Parties as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Defendants will file their Motions to Dismiss on May 6. Plaintiffs will file any Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on June 17. Defendants will file any Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition on July 8. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss will be set for hearing on July 22 at 9:00 a.m. MARINA TRUBITSKY & ASSOCIATES MARINA TRUBITSKY BY: s/ Marina Trubitsky_____________ MARINA TRUBITSKY Attorneys for Plaintiffs Universal Grading Service, John Callandrello, Joseph Komito, and Vadim Kirichenko Dated: April 4, 2011 2 STIPULATION CASE NO. C 09 02755 RMW (HRL) 1 2 3 4 5 Dated: April 4, 2011 COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) JOHN C. DWYER (136533) BENJAMIN F. CHAPMAN (234436) BY: s/ Benjamin F. Chapman_____________ BENJAMIN F. CHAPMAN (234436) Attorneys for Defendant eBay Inc. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN DIEGO Dated: April 4, 2011 GEORGE ZISER (51879) JEFFREY R. LISENBEE LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP BY: s/ JEFFREY R. LISENBEE____ JEFFREY R. LISENBEE Attorneys for Defendant Professional Numismatic Guild, Inc. FILER'S ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. Dated: April 4, 2011 By: /s/ Benjamin F. Chapman Benjamin F. Chapman ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 4/6/11 __________ ___________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 3 STIPULATION CASE NO. C 09 02755 RMW (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?