Mendez -v- Intel Corporation

Filing 110

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Stipulation Re Administrative Motion for Sealing Order re 109 Stipulation., Motions terminated: 106 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/5/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)

Download PDF
1 Perry J. Narancic (CA Bar No. 206820) pnarancic@nk-pc.com 2 Barry Lee Katzman (CA Bar No. 105851) blkatman@nk-pc.com 3 NARANCIC & KATZMAN, P.C. 325 Sharon Park Drive, #736 4 Menlo Park, California 94025 5 Telephone: (650) 814-7688 Facsimile: (650) 618-2700 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 BUSINESS APPLICATIONS PERFORMANCE CORPORATION 8 9 10 11 12 13 IN RE INTEL LAPTOP BATTERY LITIGATION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Whereas Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class certification on Oct. 22, 2010, which contain certain documents designated as confidential under the Stipulated Protective Order [D.E. 54] by the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 5:09-CV-02889-JW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR SEALING ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(d) Complaint Filed: June 26, 2009 Trial Date: None Discovery Cutoff: None 21 producing parties (the "Designated Documents") ; 22 Whereas the Plaintiffs served an Administrative Motion for a Sealing Order pursuant to 23 Local Rule 79-5(d) which provides an opportunity for the producing parties to establish that the 24 25 26 27 28 -1Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Motion for Sealing In re Intel Laptop Battery Litigation 5:09-CV-02889-JW designated information is sealable; 1 The parties identified below hereby stipulate that the producing parties shall prepare and 2 lodge any such statements relating to the Designated Documents no later than Friday November 5, 3 4 5 6 2010. The parties further stipulate that Plaintiffs shall have until Friday, November 12, 2010, to respond to the producing parties' statements. IT IS SO STIPULATED. GIRARD GIBBS LLP By: s/ Geoffrey A. Munroe Geoffrey A. Munroe Interim Class Counsel for Plaintiffs DATED: October 29, 2010 PERKINS COIE BROWN & BAIN P.A. By: ____________________ Philip A. Leider Attorneys for Defendant INTEL CORPORATION DATED: October 29, 2010 NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC By: s/ Perry J. Narancic Perry J. Narancic Attorneys for Defendant BUSINESS APPLICATIONS PERFORMANCE CORPORATION WINSTON & STRAWN, LLP By: s/ Krista Enns Krista Enns Attorneys for DELL INC. 7 DATED: October 29, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: October 29, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Motion for Sealing In re Intel Laptop Battery Litigation 5:09-CV-02889-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 29, 2010 KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP By: s/ Raymond M. Bennett Raymond M. Bennett Attorneys for LENOVO GROUP LIMITED [PROPOSED] ORDER ORDERED. Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERD. Dated: November 5, 2010 ________________________ United States District Judge -3Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Motion for Sealing In re Intel Laptop Battery Litigation 5:09-CV-02889-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?