Mendez -v- Intel Corporation

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT re 73 Stipulation Amended Pleadings due by 4/19/2010 as a separate docket entry.. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/13/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Eric H. Gibbs (State Bar No. 178658) ehg@girardgibbs.com Dylan Hughes (State Bar No. 209113) dsh@girardgibbs.com Geoffrey A. Munroe (State Bar No. 228590) gam@girardgibbs.com GIRARD GIBBS LLP 601 California Street, 14th Floor San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 Interim Class Counsel UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N C O F 4/13/2010 D IS T IC T R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re Intel Laptop Litigation Case No. 09-CV-02889-JW (PVT) JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 09-CV-02889-JW A LI FO m Judge Ja es Ware R NIA D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs filed their Amended Consolidated Complaint on January 15, 2010; WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs now seek to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint to add two additional plaintiffs; WHEREAS, without waiver of any defenses to any claims asserted therein, the Defendants Intel Corporation and Business Applications Performance Corporation have no objection to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, the parties are unaware of any events or deadlines fixed by the Court that would be affected by the proposed filing of the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint, NOW THEREFORE, the Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate that Plaintiffs be granted leave to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). IT IS SO STIPULATED DATED: April 5, 2010 By: /s Eric H. Gibbs GIRARD GIBBS LLP Interim Class Counsel By: /s Philip A. Leider PERKINS COIE LLP Attorney for Defendant Intel Corporation By: /s Perry J. Narancic NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC Attorney for Defendant Business Applications Performance Corporation DATED: April 5, 2010 DATED: April 5, 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED: On or before April 19, 2010, Plaintiffs shall file its Second Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry. Dated: April 13, 2010 ___________________________________ United States District Judge 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 09-CV-02889-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 5, 2010, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, using the electronic case files system of the court: 1. JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT The electronic case files system sent a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to Counsel of record who are registered e-filers and have consented to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed on April 5, 2010, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Angela L. Eure 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. 09-CV-02889-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?