Salazar v. Homecomings Financial Services, LLC et al

Filing 7

ORDER SETTING CONSENT/DECLINATION DEADLINE. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-Filed 7/10/09* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California LUIS SALAZAR, Plaintiff, v. No. 5:09 CV 2896 RS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ORDER SETTING CONSENT/DECLINATION DEADLINE HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC; QUANTUM SERVICING CORPORATION; ETS SERVICES LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. ______________________________________/ Defendant Quantum Servicing Corporation has filed a motion to dismiss, docket [5] in the above-captioned matter. The motion is noticed for hearing on August 12, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 73-1, all parties are directed to file their consents or declinations to magistrate jurisdiction no later than July 29, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7/10/09 __________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CASE NO. 5:09 CV 2896 RS ORDER SETTING CONSENT/DECLINATION DEADLINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED* TO: Michael James Fox T. Robert Finlay mfox@piteduncan.com rfinlay@wrightlegal.net AND A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: Luis Salazar 3889 Sark Way San Jose, CA 95111 DATED: 7/10/09 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 * Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. CASE NO. 5:09 CV 2896 RS ORDER SETTING CONSENT/DECLINATION DEADLINE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?