Ferrigno v. Philips Electronics North America Corp. et al

Filing 41

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 36 Ex Parte Application. Hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to May 14, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.; plaintiff's opposition papers shall be filed and served on or before April 23; defendants' reply papers shall be filed and served on or before April 30. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF DATE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO DISMISS No. C-09-03085 RMW

E-FILED on 4/8/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

CARL FERRIGNO, Plaintiff, v. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORP.; KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS; VICTORIA ELWELL, HEIN RENSMA, PAUL VAN DER SANDEN, individuals, and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive, Defendants.

No. C-09­03085 RMW

ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF DATE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO DISMISS [Re Docket No. 36]

Plaintiff's ex parte application to continue the hearing on the motion to dismiss by defendants Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Hein Rensma and Paul Van Der Sanden to June 11, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. and the opposition thereto has been considered by the court. The court continues the hearing date to May 14, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. The court will be available on that date. The opposition is now due April 23, 2010 and the reply is due April 30, 2010. The court is disappointed that such an application had to come before the court. Both sides, to some extent, appear to have acted unreasonably. The parties and counsel are strongly encouraged to cooperate with each other on all further scheduling and briefing matters. The

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

court is pleased that the parties have apparently agreed to scheduling dates in their Joint Case Management Conference Statement.

DATED:

4/8/10

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF DATE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO DISMISS No. C-09-03085 RMW

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Joseph Heathcliff Ainley Counsel for Defendants: Thomas Michael McInerney Erica Rocush [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated:

4/8/10

TER Chambers of Judge Whyte

ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF DATE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO DISMISS No. C-09-03085 RMW

3