Ferrigno v. Philips Electronics North America Corp. et al

Filing 56

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 51 Motion to Dismiss as unopposed and vacating hearing date. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010)

Download PDF
Ferrigno v. Philips Electronics North America Corp. et al Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HEIN RENSMA'S MOTION TO DISMISS -- No. C-09-03085 RMW TER E-FILED on 7/22/10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CARL FERRIGNO, Plaintiff, v. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORP.; KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS; VICTORIA ELWELL, HEIN RENSMA, PAUL VAN DER SANDEN, individuals, and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. C-0903085 RMW ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HEIN RENSMA'S MOTION TO DISMISS [Re Docket No. 51] Defendant Hein Rensma has moved to dismiss with prejudice the claims asserted against him under Rule 12(b)(6) on the ground that they fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The motion was noticed for hearing on July 30, 2010. On July 12, 2010, plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion, conceding that he does not substantively oppose the motion. Accordingly, for good cause appearing, the July 30, 2010 hearing date is vacated and defendant Rensma's motion to dismiss is granted. The claims are dismissed with prejudice. DATED: 7/22/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?