Cellectricon AB et al v. Fluxion Biosciences, Inc.

Filing 161

STIPULATION AND ORDER #160 of Dismissal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/3/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013) Modified on 1/3/2013 (bwS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

Eric L. Wesenberg (SBN 139696)
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE, LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-4350

NEIL ARTHUR SMITH (SBN 63777)
[e-mail]
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
50 W. San Fernando Street
Suite 1400
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 408-918-4501

Elizabeth A. Howard (SBN 173185)
[e-mail]
Deborah Fishman (SBN 197584)
[e-mail]
Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-614-7401

BRIAN M. GAFF (SBN 202896)
[e-mail]
GEORGE W. NEUNER (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER &
DODGE LLP
111 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02199-7613
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 888-325-9725

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CELLECTRICON AB and GYROS AB

Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068)
[e-mail]
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204-2988
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 503-595-5301
Attorneys for Defendant,
FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC.

18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21
22

SAN JOSE DIVISION

23
24
25
26

Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW)

CELLECTRICON AB and GYROS AB,
Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND ORDER

v.
FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC.,
Defendant.

27
28

1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW)

1

Plaintiff Cellectricon AB hereby dismisses with prejudice all of it claims asserted in this

2

action against defendant Fluxion Biosciences, Inc. Pursuant to the stipulated order dated June 23,

3

2011 in this action (Dkt 153 at p. 3 lines 16-21 and p. 5 lines 7-10), Plaintiff Gyros AB no longer

4

has an interest in the patents and patent claims in this action, it shall be dismissed as a party to this

5

action, and its claims are dismissed. Fluxion hereby dismisses all of its counterclaims asserted in

6

this action against Cellectricon and Gyros, reserving the right to assert the counterclaims if it is sued

7

in the future on any patent referenced in those counterclaims. The parties, by their counsel, hereby

8

stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), that all claims in this action are

9

dismissed in accordance with the above stipulations. The parties further stipulate that each party

10

shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Based on these stipulations and pursuant to Civil Local

11

Rules 7-1(a)(5) and 7-12, the Parties request entry of the Proposed Order submitted herewith

12
13

Dated: October 17, 2012

14

ERIC L. WESENBERG
PERKINS COIE, LLP
JEFFREY S. LOVE
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP

15
16

/s/ Jeffrey S. Love
Jeffrey S. Love
Attorneys for Defendant
Fluxion Biosciences, Inc.

17
18
19
20
21

Dated: October 17, 2012

NEIL ARTHUR SMITH
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
BRIAN M. GAFF
GEORGE W. NEUNER
EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLP

22

/s/ George W. Neuner
George W. Neuner
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Cellectricon AB and Gyros AB

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW)

1

FILERS ATTESTATION

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) and Civil Local Rule 4-2(i)(3) regarding

3

signatures, I, Jeffrey S. Love, hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has

4

been obtained from George W. Neuner, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

5
6
/s / Jeffrey S. Love

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW)

[] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Pursuant to the stipulations of the parties,
IT IS SO ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Cellectricon AB are dismissed with
prejudice; Plaintiff Gyros AB is dismissed as a party to this action and its claims are dismissed; and
Fluxion’s counterclaims are dismissed, reserving Fluxion’s right to assert the counterclaims if it is
sued in the future on any patent referenced in those counterclaims. Each party shall bear its own
costs and attorney's fees.
Dated: _________________, 201
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW)