Cellectricon AB et al v. Fluxion Biosciences, Inc.

Filing 161

STIPULATION AND ORDER 160 of Dismissal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/3/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013) Modified on 1/3/2013 (bwS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Eric L. Wesenberg (SBN 139696) ewesenberg@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE, LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650-838-4300 Facsimile: 650-838-4350 NEIL ARTHUR SMITH (SBN 63777) nsmith@rmkb.com ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 W. San Fernando Street Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-287-6262 Facsimile: 408-918-4501 Elizabeth A. Howard (SBN 173185) ehoward@orrick.com Deborah Fishman (SBN 197584) dfishman@orrick.com Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607) jangell@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 BRIAN M. GAFF (SBN 202896) bgaff@eapdlaw.com GEORGE W. NEUNER (pro hac vice) gneuner@eapdlaw.com EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199-7613 Telephone: 617-517-5597 Facsimile: 888-325-9725 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CELLECTRICON AB and GYROS AB Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068) jeffrey.love@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204-2988 Telephone: 503-595-5300 Facsimile: 503-595-5301 Attorneys for Defendant, FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC. 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 SAN JOSE DIVISION 23 24 25 26 Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW) CELLECTRICON AB and GYROS AB, Plaintiffs, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER v. FLUXION BIOSCIENCES, INC., Defendant. 27 28 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW) 1 Plaintiff Cellectricon AB hereby dismisses with prejudice all of it claims asserted in this 2 action against defendant Fluxion Biosciences, Inc. Pursuant to the stipulated order dated June 23, 3 2011 in this action (Dkt 153 at p. 3 lines 16-21 and p. 5 lines 7-10), Plaintiff Gyros AB no longer 4 has an interest in the patents and patent claims in this action, it shall be dismissed as a party to this 5 action, and its claims are dismissed. Fluxion hereby dismisses all of its counterclaims asserted in 6 this action against Cellectricon and Gyros, reserving the right to assert the counterclaims if it is sued 7 in the future on any patent referenced in those counterclaims. The parties, by their counsel, hereby 8 stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), that all claims in this action are 9 dismissed in accordance with the above stipulations. The parties further stipulate that each party 10 shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Based on these stipulations and pursuant to Civil Local 11 Rules 7-1(a)(5) and 7-12, the Parties request entry of the Proposed Order submitted herewith 12 13 Dated: October 17, 2012 14 ERIC L. WESENBERG PERKINS COIE, LLP JEFFREY S. LOVE KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 15 16 /s/ Jeffrey S. Love Jeffrey S. Love Attorneys for Defendant Fluxion Biosciences, Inc. 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: October 17, 2012 NEIL ARTHUR SMITH ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY BRIAN M. GAFF GEORGE W. NEUNER EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLP 22 /s/ George W. Neuner George W. Neuner Attorneys for Plaintiffs Cellectricon AB and Gyros AB 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW) 1 FILERS ATTESTATION 2 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) and Civil Local Rule 4-2(i)(3) regarding 3 signatures, I, Jeffrey S. Love, hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has 4 been obtained from George W. Neuner, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 5 6 /s / Jeffrey S. Love 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW) [] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pursuant to the stipulations of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Cellectricon AB are dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff Gyros AB is dismissed as a party to this action and its claims are dismissed; and Fluxion’s counterclaims are dismissed, reserving Fluxion’s right to assert the counterclaims if it is sued in the future on any patent referenced in those counterclaims. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Dated: _________________, 201 HON. RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No.: 5:09-cv-03150 (RMW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?