Beckum v. City of East Palo Alto et al

Filing 34

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND SETTING NEW DEADLINE FOR REPLY BRIEF. The hearing on Defendants motion is continued from August 31, 2010 to September 7, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. Defendants shall file any reply to Plaintiffs opposition no later than 5 p.m. on August 26, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 08/20/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)

Beckum v. City of East Palo Alto et al

Doc. 34

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

** E-filed August 20, 2010 **

NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PETER BECKUM, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO; CHIEF OF POLICE RONALD L. DAVIS; and OFFICER EDWARD SOARES, individually and in his personal capacity and his official capacity as a police officer for the City of East Palo Alto, Defendants. ____________________________________/ In light of Plaintiff's late-filed opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, the hearing on Defendants' motion is continued from August 31, 2010 to September 7, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. Defendants shall file any reply to Plaintiff's opposition no later than 5 p.m. on August 26, 2010. No. C09-03301 HRL ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SETTING NEW DEADLING FOR DEFNDANTS' REPLY BRIEF [Re: Docket No. 26]

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C09-03301 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: David Walter Washington Jeffrey Michael Vucinich Patrick Reyes Co [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

2