Pritikin et al V Comerica Bank, et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Exceed the Page Limits on the Opposition and Reply Briefs in Regards to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re 17 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/23/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2009)

5 13

7 Pa nNBA n(ciAnPla5C7IK34I-,2,33016 05108 3) 2 JOC:EE:orRe9i:oAa.,Ru,ToZpiNi1eSE(0.Q. 254)6072 5 RBPnFPokD25(e 4IeA29u t t oIV 3 F al7BohRssH cC nPU),S6Wr80 03S ( ( 58 8 K7S sefE Mo 0 - Nt a 14 9 01hxerpNiavTetCRo6LEABrISloeD6i5Q10(1244154) ) 9 Teo H r e s v)Md NRu1NN n 4 SO 2 RI u k H AE 5 I 8E . 16 1 0 6

i F f R 44 1 L1dUenMnC2Ec23m71Fft4.9O5ic0NFfT ArUER(I8IKIN )ANK SBxl3C@e@Tekr2aaa 85ca.Boi E o 9 W 3(:r uHFyo41o68-trheErc80m RtR T L Pn 7O t 0k. 7E) -70 ,oo an 3 Wr (te FP bE- ,h C i2 MEN 9s l e Ah o1OAo( ,C 5ADG.PB m 5 2 L uc 2e Fa aaoMtai)iF lIaTo@OtFhe-o2E90T C H D cr 8t14ir(zknrdlIe6C0tO 0l0Rn49Rt7f ls o MBIIT 78 B r Amtnwn:5e5r)2CESRyA.7Kl2d5nEmR ONPRNCA83 a 6 a n tw mN6 0 o t )

17 18 19 20 21
22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE) ROBERT PRlTIKIN, etal. Plaintiffs,
vs.

) Case No.: c09 03303 JF

)
) ) ) ) ) )
)

STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITS ON THE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS IN REGARDS TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DIMISS [Local Rule 7-12}

23
24

COMERICA BANK, et a1., Defendants

25
26 27 28

mf~

PRITIKIN v. COME RICA BANK ET. AL. STIPULA TION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITS ON THE OPPOSITION AND REPLY IN REGAIWS ~ DEFEijRA1)lT'S I~UUJQ~!!!!SSI!!!!!!!l!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Page 1

09/21/2009

16:40

FAX

141

003/003

1
2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs and Defendant through their respective counsel that the Plaintiffs may submit a brief in opposition to the Defendant's motion to dismiss in excess of 25 pages, but not to exceed 35 pages, and that the Defendant may submit a reply brief in excess of 15 pages, but not to exceed 25 pages.

3 4 5

6
7 8 9

DATED:

c;/ z ,-I 0 ~

.

10
11 RTL KENNETH PRlTIKIN JOSEPH CAMENZIND, IV Attorneys for the Plaintiffs.

12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19

PEG. BERTRAND RICHARD C. DARWIN Attorneys for Defendant COMERICA BANK

ORDER
20 21 22 PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED DATED:

9/23/09

_ JUDGE

23
24 25 26 27 28 PRITlKIN v. COMERICA BANK ET. AL. STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITS ON THE OPPOSITION AND REPLY ~U;tfS W REGARDS TO IHE U,r'WANI'§ MQ1I2N 10 lUWISS Page 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pritikin,

et al vs Comerica

Bank, et al

Case No.: C09 03303 JF

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of San Mateo; I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within above-entitled action; my business address is 177 Bovet Road, Suite 600, San Mateo, CA 94402 I am readily familiar with the business practice at my place of business for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the U.S. Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On September 22, 2009, at my place of business in San Mateo, California, I served the following document( s):

10
11

STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITS ON THE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS IN REGARDS TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
which document( s) was/were placed for deposit in the U. S. Postal Service in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, addressed to: . Buchalter Nemer A Professional Corporation Peter G. Bertrand Richard C. Darwin 333 Market Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105T: 415-227-0900 F: 415-227-0770 Law Offices of Kenneth Pritikin Kenneth Pritikin 2950 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 T: 925-407-2158 F: 925-262-4688

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20

X

(BY MAIL) I caused such envelope( s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail at San Mateo, California. (BY OVERNIGHT (BY PERSONAL addressee( s). MAIL) I caused such envelope(s) to be sent overnight at San Mateo, California. SERVICE) I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by band this date to the offices ofthe

o
o

21
22

o
o
0

(BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION) I caused such document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile on this date to each facsimile machine number listed above. (ST ATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

23
24

25
26

(FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court
at whose direction the service was made. Executed at San Mateo, California, on September 22, 2@09

27 28