Ortiz et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc

Filing 23

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, re 16 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/18/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2010)

UNIT ED

ER

v.
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

N

F D IS T IC T O R

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Mediation 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
The parties are working together to decide on a mutually agreeable mediator.

_____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
150 days other requested deadline _____________________________________________

2/ ____ Dated:__10/10 _____

CLA __ I _ CENTER ____UD_A ____________________ Attorney for Plaintiff JULI _ COLLINS ________ ____A________RIECHERT_______ Attorney for Defendant

2/ ____ Dated:__10/10 ______

A

C

LI

Plaintiff(s),

FO

CASE NO. C 09-03485 JW

re mes Wa Judge Ja

R NIA

GABRIEL ORTIZ, et al.

S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Cl R r Form ISTeaIC ES D TC AT T

ERED O ORD D IT IS S FIE DI AS MO

RT U O

NO

RT

H

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

[PROPOSED] ORDER
ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 150 days 9 other ___________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Feb _ ary __ 2010 Dated:___ru___18, _______

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Jam

es Ware

R NIA

ED ORDER IT IS SO DIFIED AS MO

RT U O

NO

RT

H

___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE