Ortiz et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc

Filing 89

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/2/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)

Case5:09-cv-03485-LHK Document83-9 Filed12/28/11 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

Claudia Center, State Bar No. 158255
Jinny Kim, State Bar No. 208953
Rachael Langston, State Bar No. 257950
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY-EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
180 Montgomery St., Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Emails: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

Joshua Konecky, State Bar No. 182897
SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL BRAYTON KONECKY, LLP
180 Montgomery St., Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17
18

GABRIEL ORTIZ, ANDREW GONZALES,
LANDON MICKEY MILLER, AND JOE
HUYNH,
Plaintiffs,

19
20

v.

21
22
23
24
25
26

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:09-cv-03485-LHK
[Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT
DATE: February 2, 2012
TIME: 1:30 p.m.
LOCATION: Courtroom 8
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh

27
28
29
30
31
32

__________________________________________________________________________________________________
[Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No. 5:09-cv-03485-LHK

Case5:09-cv-03485-LHK Document83-9 Filed12/28/11 Page2 of 2

1
2

WHEREAS on October 5, 2011, this Court granted preliminary approval to the settlement
of this action, embodied in the Class Action Settlement Agreement.

3
4

WHEREAS the Court granted final approval to the Class Action Settlement Agreement
on

, 2012 finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate within the

5
6
7

meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(d) and applicable law; and
WHEREAS the Court has found that the notice sent to class members fairly and
adequately informed them of the terms of the settlement, was consistent with Federal Rule of

8
Civil Procedure 23 and due process, and was given in the manner prescribed by the Settlement
9
10
11

Agreement and the Court’s order preliminarily approving the settlement;
This Court hereby enters final judgment in this case, and dismisses it with prejudice in

12

accordance with the terms of the Order (1) Confirming Final Certification of Classes; (2)

13

Granting Final Approval to Class Action Settlement Agreement; (3) Approving Awards to

14

Named Plaintiffs (“Final Approval Order”) and (4) Granting Plaintiffs’ Application for an Award

15

of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.

16

Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court reserves

17

exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this action, the named plaintiffs, the certified class and

18

the defendant for purposes of supervising the implementation, enforcement, construction and

19

interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, the Preliminary Approval Order, the Final Approval

20

Order, the Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Application for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, and

21

this Final Judgment.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: February , 2012

_________________________________
The Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

26
27
28
29
30
31

____________________________________________________________________________________________
[Proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No. 5:09-cv-03485-LHK

32

1