Openwave Systems, Inc. v. 724 Solutions (US) Inc et al

Filing 183

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE. Claims Construction Hearing set for 11/3/2010 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/1/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2010)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 6/1/10* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP S A N FR A N C I S C O A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. (SBN 57409) BRETT M. SCHUMAN (SBN 189247) AHREN C. HOFFMAN (SBN 250469) RYAN L. SCHER (SBN 244706) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.442.1001 E-mail: djjohnson@morganlewis.com E-mail: bschuman@morganlewis.com E-mail: ahoffman@morganlewis.com E-mail: rscher@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC. and OPENWAVE SYSTEMS (ROI) LTD. CLAUDE M. STERN (SBN 96737) EVETTE D. PENNYPACKER (SBN 203515) RAY ZADO (SBN 208501) THAI LE (SBN 267460) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Tel: 650.801.5000 Fax: 650.801.5100 E-mail: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com E-mail: evettepennypacker@quinnemanuel.com E-mail: rayzado@quinnemanuel.com E-mail: thaile@quinnemanuel.com JESSE GERACI (Bar No. 259755) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: 415.875.6600 Fax: 415.875.6700 E-mail: jessegeraci@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 724 SOLUTIONS (US) INC. and 724 SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and OPENWAVE SYSTEMS (ROI) LTD., its Republic of Ireland subsidiary, Plaintiffs, v. 724 SOLUTIONS (US) INC., a Delaware corporation, and 724 SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS DB2/21732071.1 Case No. 09-CV-03511 (RS, HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Openwave Systems, Inc. and Openwave Systems (ROI) Ltd. (together, "Openwave"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendants and Counterclaimants 724 Solutions (US) Inc. and 724 Solutions Software Inc. (together, "724 Solutions"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on February 18, 2010, Openwave filed its Motion to Disqualify Defendants' Counsel, Fish & Richardson P.C. ("Motion," Dkt. No. 89); WHEREAS, on April 22, 2010, this Court issued its Order Granting Motion to Disqualify Counsel ("Order," Dkt. No. 167); WHEREAS, the Order stated that "[t]he deadlines set out in the Case Management Scheduling Order entered on March 11, 2010 shall remain in place for now, but [plaintiffs] will be expected to accommodate any reasonable request from new counsel for a stipulation to extend any or all of those deadlines" (Order 11:4-7); WHEREAS, on May 21, 2010, 724 Solutions filed a Notice of Substitution of Attorneys and Proposed Order, whereby 724 Solutions substituted Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP ("New Counsel") as attorneys of record in place of Fish & Richardson P.C. (Dkt. No. 181); WHEREAS, on May 21, 2010, 724 Solutions' New Counsel requested that Openwave stipulate to extending the deadlines set forth in the Court's March 11, 2010 Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. 123); WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding those deadlines; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that the following schedule pertaining to events through the claim construction hearing shall apply: Patent L.R. 4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction Patent L.R. 4-2 Exchange of Preliminary Case Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Patent L.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim Construction Discovery DB2/21732071.1 July 12, 2010 July 26, 2010 August 13, 2010 September 13, 2010 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 09-CV-03511 (RS) 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Patent L.R. 4-5(a) Opening Claim Construction Brief Patent L.R. 4-5(b) Responsive Claim Construction Brief Patent L.R. 4-5(c) Reply Claim Construction Brief Tutorial Claim Construction Hearing September 27, 2010 October 12, 2010 October 19, 2010 October 27, 2010 November 1-12, 2010 (during either week at the court's convenience) Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 28, 2010 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By /s/ Brett Schuman Brett M. Schuman Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND OPENWAVE SYSTEMS (ROI) LTD. Dated: May 28, 2010 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By Evette Pennypacker Evette D. Pennypacker Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants, 724 SOLUTIONS (US) INC. AND 724 SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INC. 28 DB2/21732071.1 2 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 09-CV-03511 (CRB, HRL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O [PROPOSED] ORDER The proposed amended schedule set forth above is hereby adopted by the Court as the schedule for this case through the claim construction hearing. The claim construction hearing shall take place on November 3, 2010 (date) at 10:00 AM (time). The parties shall comply with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/1/10 By HON. RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 DB2/21732071.1 3 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE CASE NO. 09-CV-03511 (CRB, HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?