Openwave Systems, Inc. v. 724 Solutions (US) Inc et al

Filing 29

ORDER to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss re 26 Stipulation filed by 724 Solutions (US) Inc, 724 Solutions Software, Inc., Openwave Systems, Inc., Motions terminated: 17 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by 724 Solutions (US) Inc, 724 Solutions Software, Inc. Defendants have until and including 11/12/2009 to respond to complaint. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/29/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SPRINKLE IP LAW GROUP, P.C. Elizabeth J. Brown Fore (Bar No. 200471) 1301 West 25th Street, Suite 408 Austin, Texas 78705 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorney for Defendants 724 Solutions (US) Inc. and 724 Solutions Software, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OPENWAVE SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation v. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:09-CV-03511-CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW DEFENDANTS 724 SOLUTIONS (US) INC.'S AND 724 SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Date: October 30, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Judge: Hon.. Charles R. Breyer Courtroom: 8

724 SOLUTIONS (US) INC., a Delaware Corporation, and 724 SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendants.

Defendants 724 Solutions (US) Inc. and 724 Solutions Software Inc. ("Defendants") have decided to withdraw their Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for More Definite Statement which is currently set for hearing on October 30, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff Openwave Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiff") has agreed to give Defendants fourteen (14) days to respond to the Complaint, making Defendants response due November 12, 2009. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is hereby taken off of the Court's docket, and it is further ORDERED that Defendants have until and including November 12, 2009 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

Dated: Oct. 29, 2009

The Honorable Charles R. BreyerDERED SO OR
IT IS
NO

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

. Breyer harles R [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW DEFENDANTS' MOTIONuTO DISMISS, OR IN THE J dge C ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT ­ 3:09-cv-03511-CRB

FO

R NIA

RT

H