Gemtek Technology Co., LTD v. 3Com Corporation

Filing 55

ORDER Regarding Schedule. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/10/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14

GEMTEK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
3COM CORPORATION,

15

Defendant.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:09-CV-03659-LHK

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE

At a Case Management Conference on May 18, 2011, the parties represented that they had

18

reached a settlement in principle, but had not yet signed a finalized settlement agreement. The

19

Court ordered that the parties either file a stipulated dismissal by June 8, 2010, or file a status

20

report indicating why the settlement had not yet been finalized and proposing a new deadline for

21

dismissal. The Court ordered that the case schedule would remain as set.

22

On June 8, 2011, the parties filed a statement indicating that they signed a finalized

23

settlement agreement on June 8, 2011, and that a stipulated dismissal of the action is “expected to

24

be filed” with the Court by July 1, 2011.

25

The parties shall file the stipulated dismissal by July 1, 2011. Until a stipulated dismissal is

26

filed, the case deadlines remain as set. The Court will not continue the case schedule absent

27

exigent circumstances.

28
1
Case No.: 5:09-CV-03659-LHK
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: June 10, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:09-CV-03659-LHK
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE