Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. v. Chipmos Technologies Inc

Filing 159

ORDER APPROVING 158 STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/6/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

COOLEY LLP
RONALD S. LEMIEUX (120822) ([e-mail])
VIDYA R. BHAKAR (220210) ([e-mail])
SHANÉE Y.W. NELSON (221310) ([e-mail])
3000 El Camino Real
Five Palo Alto Square
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-849-7400
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ChipMOS Technologies, Inc.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

GREG L. LIPPETZ (State Bar No. 154228)
[e-mail]
JACQUELINE K. S. LEE (State Bar No. 247705)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
Silicon Valley Office
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-739-3900
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., a
corporation,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23

vs.

CASE NO. 5:09-CV-03689-JF-PSG
STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY
BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS’
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;
DECLARATION OF SHANÉE Y. W.
NELSON; [PROPOSED] ORDER

ChipMOS Technologies, Inc., a
corporation,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Defendant.

24
25

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

Complaint filed: July 13, 2009
Trial Date: TBD

26
27
28
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-03689-JF-PSG

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS’ MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Freescale

2

Semiconductor, Inc. (“Freescale”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant ChipMOS Technologies,

3

Inc. (“ChipMOS”) jointly submit this Stipulated Request for an extension of time to file and serve

4

their Opposition and Reply briefs regarding ChipMOS’ Motion for Reconsideration.

5

The dates for filing the Response and the Reply were set by the Court’s Order filed

6

September 22, 2011 [Docket No. 156]. Under the September 22, 2011 Order, ChipMOS’ opening

7

brief is currently due on October 17, 2011, Freescale’s Opposition is currently due on October

8

31, 2011, and ChipMOS’ Reply is currently due on November 7, 2011. The parties have agreed

9

to extend the dates for Freescale’s Opposition and ChipMOS’s Reply. The parties’ proposed

10

revised briefing schedule is as follows:

11

ChipMOS’ Opening Brief:

12

Freescale’s Opposition Brief: November 7, 2011

13

ChipMOS’s Reply Brief:

14

This request for an extension is supported by the Declaration of Shanèe Y. W. Nelson

15

DATED: September 27, 2011

November 14, 2011

being filed herewith.

16

October 17, 2011

17

Respectfully submitted,
COOLEY LLP
RONALD S. LEMIEUX
VID R. BHAKAR
SHANÉE Y.W. NELSON

18
19

By: /s/ Shanèe Y. W. Nelson
SHANÉE Y. W. NELSON

20
21

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ChipMOS Technologies, Inc.

22
23
24
25

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

26
27
28
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-03689-JF-PSG

-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS’ MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

1

DATED: September 27, 2011

2
3

JONES DAY
GREG L. LIPPETZ
JACQUELINE K. S. LEE
By: /s/ Jacqueline K. S. Lee
JACQUELINE K. S. LEE

4

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-03689-JF-PSG

-3-

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS’ MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

1

DECLARATION OF SHANÉE Y. W. NELSON

2

I, Shanèe Y. W. Nelson, declare

3

1.

I am an attorney at the law firm of Cooley LLP, counsel in this action for

4

Defendant and Counterclaimant ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. (“ChipMOS”). I have personal

5

knowledge of the facts contained within this declaration, and if called as a witness, could testify

6

competently to the matters contained herein.

7

2.

On Friday, September 23, 2011 I contacted Jacqueline Lee, counsel for Freescale,

8

requesting Freescale’s agreement to modify the briefing schedule set by the Court’s

9

September 22, 2011 Order to accommodate the international travel schedule of Ron Lemieux,

10

counsel for ChipMOS. Mr. Lemieux’s travel plans were booked several weeks prior to the

11

Court’s Order.

12

3.

The parties have conferred and agreed to an extension of time to file the

13

Opposition and Reply briefs regarding ChipMOS’ Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to the

14

schedule requested in the Stipulated Request.

15
16
17
18
19
20

4.

There have been no previous modifications to the briefing schedule set in the

Court’s September 22, 2011 Order.
5.

The requested time modification will have no effect on any other deadlines set by

the Court or on the schedule for this case.
I declare under penalty of perjury that to the best of my knowledge the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed on September 27, 2011 in Palo Alto, California.

21
/s/ Shanèe Y. W. Nelson
Shanèe Y. W. Nelson

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-03689-JF-PSG

-4-

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS’ MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

1

ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: ______________, 2011

6
7

Jeremy Fogel
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-03689-JF-PSG

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE CHIPMOS’ MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION