Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. v. Chipmos Technologies Inc

Filing 236

ORDER REFERRING PARTIES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN CASE. This action is referred to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins for a settlement conference to occur no later than 6/28/2013. The Clerk shall reassign this case to Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. All matters previously scheduled before District Judge Edward J. Davila are VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/15/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:09-cv-03689 EJD FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 11 ORDER REFERRING PARTIES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN CASE Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 18 / Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Statement filed subsequent to the Interim Pretrial Conference on April 5, 2013 (see Docket Item No. 235); the court orders as follows: 1. Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 7-2, this action is referred to Magistrate Judge 19 Nathanael Cousins for a settlement conference to occur no later than June 28, 2013. 20 The parties are instructed to contact Judge Cousins’ courtroom deputy to arrange a 21 date for the conference. 22 2. As the parties agree to assignment to a magistrate judge for all purposes including 23 trial, the Clerk shall reassign this case to Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. All 24 matters previously scheduled before District Judge Edward J. Davila are VACATED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: April 15, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:09-cv-03689 EJD ORDER REFERRING PARTIES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN CASE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?