Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. v. Chipmos Technologies Inc

Filing 59

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR FREESCALE TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF re 54 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/2/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. v. Chipmos Technologies Inc

Doc. 59

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Greg L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228) [e-mail] JONES DAY Silicon Valley Office 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900 John R. Colgan (IL Bar No. 6289249) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] JONES DAY 77 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-1692 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 312-782-8585 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Plaintiff, v. ChipMOS Technologies, Inc., Defendant.

Case No. C-09-03689-JF-PVT STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR FREESCALE TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF Date: July 2, 2010 Time: 09:00 a.m. Dept: 3, 5th Floor Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel Complaint filed: July 13, 2009 Trial Date: Not Set JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. ("Freescale") and Defendant ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. ("ChipMOS") submit this Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Freescale to File its Reply Brief.

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR FREESCALE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF C-09-03689-JF-PVT

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and

WHEREAS ChipMOS filed its Opposition to Freescale's Motion for Summary Judgment on June 14, 2010; WHEREAS Freescale's response is currently due on June 18, 2010; WHEREAS the parties stipulated to extend ChipMOS' time to respond its Opposition to Freescale's Motion for Summary Judgment from June 11, 2010 to June 14, 2010 to accommodate the filing of a third party declaration as long as copies of all other papers were delivered to Freescale on June 11, 2020. WHEREAS ChipMOS has agreed that Freescale can file its response on June 21, 2010;

WHEREAS the requested enlargement will not affect any other deadlines. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, subject to the Court's approval, that Freescale is permitted to file its Reply Brief on June 21, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Greg L. Lippetz Greg L. Lippetz State Bar No. 154228 JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900

Counsel for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

-2-

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR FREESCALE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF C-09-03689-JF-PVT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. Dated: June 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP RONALD S. LEMIEUX SHANEE Y.W. NELSON KAREN HU By: /s/ Shanee Y.W. Nelson SHANEE Y.W. NELSON

Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant ChipMOS Technologies, Inc.

------------------ ORDER [PROPOSED] Pursuant to the stipulation above, Freescale's deadline to file its Reply Brief is extended to June 21, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED.

7/2 DATED: ___________________, 2010

Hon. Jeremy Fogel, U.S. District Judge

-3-

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR FREESCALE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF C-09-03689-JF-PVT