Mora v. USDA et al

Filing 21

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2010. Joint case management statement due 2/2/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/30/2009. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed November 30, 2009 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION BERNABE MORA, v. USDA, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Upon filing, this action was scheduled for an initial case management conference on December 8, 2009. Defendant USDA has since filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, a motion for summary judgment that is set for hearing on January 5, 2010. (Docket No. 12.) Good cause appearing, the initial Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED to February 9, 2010 at 1:30pm in Courtroom 2, 5th floor of the United States District Court, San Jose. The parties shall submit an updated Joint Case Management Statement no later than February 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2009 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C09-03809 HRL ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE For the Northern District of California Plaintiff, HOWARD R. LLOYD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C 09-03809 Notice will be electronically mailed to: James A. Scharf james.scharf@usdoj.gov, mimi.lam@usdoj.gov Notice will be sent by other means to: Bernabe Mora 247 Shasta Street Watsonville, CA 95016 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?