Yieldboost Technologies, Inc. v. Photon Dynamics, Inc. et al

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 52 Changing Time Pursuant to L.R. 6-2. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 3/22/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 3/22/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS (SBN. 118206) TEDDY K. JOE (SBN. 242589) DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] MATTHEW J.M. PREBEG (pro hac vice) HOLLY H. BARNES (pro hac vice) GOLDSTEIN & FAUCETT, L.L.P. 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff, YIELDBOOST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CLAUDE M. STERN (SBN 96737) ROBERT B. WILSON (pro hac vice) JESSE GERACI (SBN 259755) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Main No.: [phone] Fax No.: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorney for Defendants PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and ORBOTECH, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YIELDBOOST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC., a California corporation, and ORBOTECH, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No.: 5:09-cv-03828-RS (PVT) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-03828-RS (PVT)

­1­

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2010, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 (D.I. 47), requesting that the Motion be heard on April 6, 2010; WHEREAS, on March 17, 2010, Defendants filed a Motion to Shorten Time To Hear Defendants' Motion To Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 (D.I. 48), proposing that Plaintiff file its Opposition no later than Wednesday, March 24, 2010, that Defendants file a Reply no later than Monday, March 29, 2010, and that the Court will hear Defendants' Motion To Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 on Tuesday, April 6, 2010, at 10:00 am; WHEREAS, on March 18, 2010, the Court issued an Order Setting Deadline For Plaintiff To File An Opposition To Defendants' Motion to Shorten Time (D.I. 51), setting today, March 19, 2010 as the deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Shorten Time; WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel, met, conferred and stipulated to the following briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1:

Event Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1

Deadline

March 26, 2010

March 30, 2010

April 6, 2010

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-03828-RS (PVT)

­2­

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that the date for filing Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 shall be March 26, 2010, the date for filing Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent L.R. 3-1 shall be March 30, 2010, and the hearing on said matter is April 6, 2010 at 10:00 am.

Dated: March 19, 2010

By: Jesse Geraci

/s/ Attorney for Defendants PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and ORBOTECH, INC.

Dated: March 19, 2010

By:

/s/ Michael E. Dergosits Attorney for Plaintiff YIELDBOOST TECH., INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____3/22/10______

By:_________________________________ THE HONORABLE PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-03828-RS (PVT)

­3­