Yieldboost Technologies, Inc. v. Photon Dynamics, Inc. et al

Filing 80

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 75 to Shorten Time for Hearing on Yieldboost's Motion to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 4/8/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 4/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Michael E. Dergosits (SBN 118206) 2 Teddy K. Joe (SBN 242589) Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 705-6377 Facsimile: (415) 750-6383 4 Email: mdergosits@dergnoah.com Email: tjoe@dergnoah.com 5 GOLDSTEIN FAUCETT & PREBEG, LLP 6 Matthew J.M. Prebeg (pro hac vice) Edward W. Goldstein(pro hac vice) Holly H. Barnes (pro hac vice) 7 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 8 Telephone: (713) 877-1515 Facsimile: (713) 877-1737 mprebeg@gfpiplaw.com 9 Email: Email egoldstein@gfpiplaw.com hbarnes@gfpiplaw.com 10 Email: 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff INC. YIELDBOOST TECH, 12 13 14 15 16 17 YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., 18 19 v. Plaintiff, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (SBN 96737) Robert B. Wilson (pro hac vice) Jesse Geraci (SBN 259755) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Main No.: (650) 801-5000 Fax No.: (650) 801-5100 Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Email: robertwilson@quinnemanuel.com Email: jessegeraci@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Defendants PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and ORBOTECH, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. C 09-03828 RS (PVT) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEARING ON YIELDBOOST'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Hearing: Time: Crtrm.: Judge: Mon, April 19, 2010 10:00 a.m. Crtrm. 5, 4th Floor Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull 20 PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. AND ORBOTECH, INC., 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 03740.51469/3421708.1 Case No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 1 WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Production of 2 Documents (Dkt. No. 55), requesting that the Motion be heard on April 6, 2010; 3 WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Shorten Time To Hear 4 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 57), proposing that Defendants 5 file their Opposition no later than Monday, March 29, 2010, that Plaintiff file a Reply no later than 6 Friday, April 2, 2010, and that the Court will hear Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of 7 Documents on Tuesday, April 6, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.; 8 WHEREAS, on March 25, 2010, Defendants filed an Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to 9 Shorten Time To Hear Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 62) 10 proposing that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents be heard and briefed on the 11 normal schedule; 12 WHEREAS, the Court has not ruled on Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time To Hear Its 13 Motion to Compel Production of Documents, the Defendants have not yet filed their Opposition, 14 and Plaintiff has not yet filed a Reply; 15 WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel, met, conferred and stipulated to the following 16 briefing schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 03740.51469/3421708.1 Event Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Deadline April 6, 2010 April 12, 2010 April 19, 2010 Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT) -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 1 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that the date for 2 filing Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents shall be 3 April 6, 2010, the date for filing Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production 4 of Documents shall be April 12, 2010, and the hearing on said matter is April 19, 2010 at 10:00 5 a.m. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under Dated: April 6, 2010 By: /s/ Teddy K. Joe Teddy K. Joe Attorneys for Plaintiff YIELDBOOST TECH, INC. Dated: April 6, 2010 By: /s/ Jesse Geraci Jesse Geraci Attorneys for Defendants PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and ORBOTECH, INC. 15 penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Ted Joe. 16 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 03740.51469/3421708.1 Dated: April 6, 2010 By: /s/ Jesse Geraci Jesse Geraci DATED: __April 7__, 2010 Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull United States Magistrate Judge Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT) -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?