Ho v. Astrue

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING 14 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT MAY FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/16/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration SHEA LITA BOND, SBN D.C. 469103 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415-977-8934 Fax: 415-744-0134 E-mail: Shea.Bond@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant **E-Filed 4/21/2010** 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/16/2010 By: PHUONG HO, ) CIVIL NO. 5:09-cv-3933 JF ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING ) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. ) WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT MAY ) FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Acting Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) Defendant, through his undersigned attorney, moves this Court for an Order granting Defendant an extension of time until May 14, 2010, within which to file his response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This Order is sought on the following grounds: Defendant's responsive pleading was due April 14, 2010. The undersigned needs additional time to communicate with the Appeals Council regarding the issues raised in Plaintiff's brief. On April 14, 2010, 2009, the undersigned informed Plaintiff's attorney of this Motion for Extension of Time, and his office stated that they had no objection. Dated: April 15, 2010 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ Shea Lita Bond SHEA LITA BOND Special Assistant United States Attorney _________________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?