Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc. et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11. Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 8/19/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/29/10.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2010)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 7/29/10* 1 PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) 2 CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198) 3 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A 4 Telephone: 510/832-5001 5 reinlawoffice@aol.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CELIA McGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN Oakland, CA 94612 Facsimile: 510/832-4787 ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. BARRITA, INC. dba LA NICANDRO BARRITA; ENS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 / Case No. C09-4057 RS Civil Rights 14 VICTORIA TAQUERIA; 15 ASSOCIATES INVESTMENTS, 16 DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 L A W O F F IC E S O F LLC; MASOUD SHAHIDI; AND Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for administrative relief from General Order 56 is hereby GRANTED for good cause shown. A case management conference is set for 8/26/ _ at ____ a.m. ____10___10:00 ____, with case management conference statements due _8/_9/____________. _ 1 _ 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7/29 Dated: __________, 2010 Honorable RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge PAUL L. REIN 200 L A K E S I D E D R ., S U I T E A O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503 (510) 832-5001 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 CASE NO. C09-4057 RS S:\CASES\L\LA VICTORIA\PLEADINGS\Proposed Order for Relief from GO 56.PL.wpd -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?