Errico et al v. Pacific Capital Bank, N.A., et al
Filing
61
ORDER Requiring Parties to File Joint Status Report by 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 11, 2011. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/9/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
WILLIAM ERRICO, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
PACIFIC CAPITAL BANK, N.A., ET AL.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 09-CV-04072-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT BY
4:00PM, WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 2011
On or around May 3, 2011, the parties contacted the undersigned’s Courtroom Deputy to
18
advise the Court that the parties had reached a settlement in this matter. As of the filing of this
19
Order, however, the parties have not filed a notice of settlement or a stipulation of dismissal. As
20
the parties are aware, Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint is set for hearing on
21
Thursday, May 19, 2011. Absent a stipulation of dismissal or withdrawal of the motion, the May
22
19, 2011 motion hearing remains as set.
23
In light of the parties’ potential settlement, however, the Court ORDERS the parties to file
24
a joint status report advising the Court of: (1) whether the case has settled; and (2) if so, when the
25
parties will file a stipulation of dismissal. The joint status report is due as soon as practicable but,
26
//
27
//
28
1
Case No.: 09-CV-04072-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT
1
in any event, no later than 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 11, 2011.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: May 9, 2011
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 09-CV-04072-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?