Hernandez-Torres v. USA

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIM. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/28/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 *E-FILED - 9/28/12* 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 10 NO. CR-07-00363-RMW Plaintiff/Respondent, 11 (Related to: C-09-04234-RMW) v. 12 ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIM JUAN HERNANDEZ-TORRES 13 Defendant/Movant. 14 15 16 On September 11, 2009 Juan Hernandez-Torres filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to 17 Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Person in Federal Custody. Hernandez-Torres was 18 sentenced on January 16, 2009 to 65 months confinement following his open plea to illegal re-entry 19 following deportation. He made four claims for relief in his § 2255 motion: (1) ineffective 20 assistance of counsel for counsel's failure to file a promised notice of appeal; (2) his sentence was 21 unreasonable because he should have received a departure under Guideline § 5K3.1 for the early 22 disposition program; (3) his sentence was unreasonable because the court failed to take into 23 consideration his family ties and responsibilities; and (4) he should be released for deportation. 24 Grounds (2) - (4) were dismissed by order dated March 22, 2012. By order dated June 22, 25 2011 defendant was ordered to supply some clarifying facts regarding the first ground of his motion 26 by July 29, 2011. Defendant was warned than if he failed to provide the requested information, his 27 motion would be denied. Defendant has failed to submit the requested information. Therefore, his § 28 2255 motion is denied. ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIM CR-07-00363-RMW (Related to: C-09-04234-RMW) 1 Defendant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the motion 2 states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right or that they would find it debatable whether 3 this court was correct in its procedural ruling. Therefore, defendant is not entitled to a Certificate of 4 Appealability. See 28 U.S.C. §2253. 5 The Clerk shall close the file. 6 7 DATED: 9/28/12 8 _______________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIM CR-07-00363-RMW (Related to: C-09-04234-RMW) 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, Case Numbers: CV09-04234 RMW CR-07-00373 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. JUAN HERNANDEZ-TORRES, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 28, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Juan Hernandez-Torres #10682-111 Federal Correctional Institution PO Box 52020 Bennettsville, SC 29512 Dated: September 28, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?