Cruz v. JSJ-SC Project Inc.
Filing
14
ORDER Denying without Prejudice 10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/30/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
N
F D IS T IC T O R
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11
DAL BON & MARGAIN
A PRO F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JSJ-SC PROJECT INC.; EUGENE K YOO; ) ) ) and SOON YOUL LEE ) ) Defendant(s) ) ______________________________________ ) ) EMILIA CRUZ Case No. C09-04296 JW HRL
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 41(a)(2). 24 25 26 27 28
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO EUGENE K YOO; and SOON YOUL LEE
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO EUGENE K YOO; and SOON YOUL LEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PLAINTIFF EMILIA CRUZ hereby dismisses defendants EUGENE K YOO; and SOON YOUL LEE without prejudice pursuant to FRCP
Dated: March 15, 2010
1
A
C
LI
3/30/2010
jdblaw@earthlink.net margainlaw@hotmail.com
FO
mes Wa Judge Ja
re
R NIA
JAMES DAL BON, Bar No. 157942 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 DAL BON & MARGAIN, APC 28 NORTH 1ST SUITE 210 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL (408) 297-4729 FAX (408) 297-4728
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
HOUT D WIT DENIE UDICE PREJ
RT U O
NO
RT
H
1 2
Respectfully submitted, By: //s// Tomas E. Margain
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
DAL BON & MARGAIN
A PRO F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
TOMAS MARGAIN Attorneys for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED: Defendants Eugene K. Yoo and Soon Youl Lee filed an answer on March 5, 2010 (Docket Item No. 9). In light of the answer, the plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal is denied without prejudice to the plaintiff filing a stipulated dismissal with these defendants. Dated: March 30, 2010 _______________________________ United States District Judge
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO EUGENE K YOO; and SOON YOUL LEE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?