Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc.

Filing 16

(Proposed) Order Granting Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Rocky Mountain Bank. (Horoupian, Grace) (Filed on 9/21/2009) Modified on 9/22/2009 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc. Doc. 16 Case5:09-cv-04385-JW Document16 Filed09/21/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK, a Wyoming corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. 5:09-CV-04385 PVT (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (FILED UNDER SEAL) Complaint filed: September 17, 2009 THE COURT, having considered Plaintiff Rocky Mountain Bank's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (the "Motion"), and being fully advised in the premises, hereby FINDS as follows: 1. 2. 3. The Bank has satisfied the requirements for the issuance of a temporary restraining order under F.R.C.P. 65(b). The Bank has shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its legal claims against Defendant Google Inc. ("Google"). The Bank and its customers will suffer immediate and irreparable injury, loss, and/or damage if the Confidential Customer Information is not adequately protected and the Bank is unable to take appropriate ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CASE NO. __________ 4834-3217-6388.1 -1- Dockets.Justia.com Case5:09-cv-04385-JW Document16 Filed09/21/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 steps to ensure that the Confidential Customer Information is not misused. 4. The Bank and its customers will suffer greater injury from the denial of temporary injunctive relief than Google will suffer from the granting of such relief. 5. The granting of this temporary restraining order will serve the public interest. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. 2. 3. 4. Google and the Google account holder are enjoined from using the Confidential Customer Information; The Gmail Account shall immediately be frozen or deactivated to prevent any access to the Confidential Customer Information; Google shall immediately delete the Inadvertent Email from Google's system; Google shall immediately determine the status of the Gmail Account, specifically, whether the Gmail Account is active or dormant and whether the Inadvertent Email was opened or otherwise manipulated by the account holder and disclose such information to the Bank; and 5. In the event that the Gmail Account is not dormant, Google shall ascertain the identity of the Gmail Account holder, so that the Bank can take appropriate steps with the account holder to ensure that the Confidential Customer Information is not distributed or otherwise misused. 6. This Temporary Restraining Order entered on this ___ day of _____________________, 2009 at ________ a.m./p.m. and shall expire within ten days unless within that time it is extended for good cause shown. -2- ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CASE NO. __________ 4834-3217-6388.1 Case5:09-cv-04385-JW Document16 Filed09/21/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. A hearing shall be held in Courtroom ___ of the United States district Court Northern District of California commencing at _____ _.m. on the ___ day of ______________, 2009 on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. 8. This Temporary Restraining Order and all supporting pleadings and papers must be served upon Google on or before the ___ day of _____________________, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ____, 2009 District Court Judge ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CASE NO. __________ 4834-3217-6388.1 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?