Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc.

Filing 31

Proposed Order re 30 Amended MOTION to Vacate Hearing on 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. by Google, Inc.. (Sauro, Troy) (Filed on 9/25/2009) Modified on 9/25/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc. Doc. 31 Case5:09-cv-04385-JW Document31 Filed09/25/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK, a Wyoming corporation, Plaintiff, Case No. 5:09-CV-04385 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO VACATE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TO VACATE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. -1ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO VACATE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TO VACATE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER CASE NO. 5:09-CV-04385 JW 4815-5339-0340.1 Dockets.Justia.com Case5:09-cv-04385-JW Document31 Filed09/25/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS MATTER has come before the undersigned on Plaintiff Rocky Mountain Bank and Defendant Google Inc.'s Stipulated Motion to Vacate Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and to Vacate Temporary Restraining Order (the "Motion"). Upon review of the pleadings it is hereby: ORDERED that the parties Motion shall be and hereby is GRANTED. The Hearing scheduled for September 28, 2009 is vacated and the TRO entered on September 23, 2009 is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO VACATE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TO VACATE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER CASE NO. 5:09-CV-04385 JW 4834-3217-6388.1 DONE this ______ day of ______________, 2009. BY THE COURT THE HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JAMES WARE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?