Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc.

Filing 755

Download PDF
Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc. Doc. 755 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregory P. Stone (SBN 078329) Andrea Weiss Jeffries (SBN 183408) Fred A. Rowley, Jr. (SBN 192298) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 Email: gregory.stone@mto.com Email: andrea.jeffries@mto.com Email: fred.rowley@mto.com Peter A. Detre (SBN 182619) Rosemarie T. Ring (SBN 220769) Jennifer L. Polse (SBN 219202) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 Email: peter.detre@mto.com Email: rose.ring@mto.com Email: jen.polse@mto.com Attorneys for RAMBUS INC. Rollin A. Ransom (SBN 196126) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1010 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Email: rransom@sidley.com Pierre J. Hubert (Pro Hac Vice) Craig N. Tolliver (Pro Hac Vice) McKOOL SMITH PC 300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700 Austin, TX 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Facsimile: (512) 692-8744 Email: phubert@mckoolsmith.com Email: ctolliver@mckoolsmith.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, vs. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., CASE NO. 05-00334 RMW RAMBUS INC.'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (LOCAL RULES 79-5 AND 7-11) IN CONNECTION WITH RAMBUS'S CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO MANUFACTURERS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT Judge: Trial Date: Date: Dept: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte Jan. 19, 2009 Dec. 11, 2008 Courtroom 6, 4th Floor Defendant. 6349103.1 RAMBUS INC.'S ADMIN MOT TO FILE UNDER SEAL NOS. 05-00334 RMW; 06-244 RMW; 06-00244 RMW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, vs. MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. and MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants. CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW CASE NO: C-06-00244 RMW 6349103.1 RAMBUS INC.'S ADMIN MOT TO FILE UNDER SEAL NOS. 05-00334 RMW; 06-244 RMW; 06-00244 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6349103.1 Pursuant to Local Rules 79.5 and 7-11, Rambus Inc. ("Rambus") respectfully requests that the Court permit the filing under seal of the following documents lodged with the Court in connection with Rambus's Consolidated Opposition to Manufacturers' Motions for Summary Judgment on Willful Infringement: 1. Rambus Inc.'s Consolidated Opposition to Manufacturers' Motions for Summary Judgment on Willful Infringement This motion contains information that is "Confidential," "Special Confidential/Highly Confidential," or "Confidential -- Outside Counsel Only" under the Protective Order. See Declaration of Jeffrey Y. Wu In Support of Motion for Administrative Relief ("Wu Decl.") 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 79.5, Rambus has e-filed a redacted version of this motion. 2. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, K, O, P, U, V, and W to the Declaration of Jeffrey Y. Wu in Support of Rambus's Consolidated Opposition to Manufacturers' Motions for Summary Judgment on Willful Infringement Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, K, O, P, U, V, and W contain information that is "Confidential," "Special Confidential/Highly Confidential," or "Confidential -- Outside Counsel Only" under the Protective Order. Wu Decl. 5. Rambus hereby requests leave to file under seal the confidential versions of each of the documents set forth above. DATED: November 14, 2008 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ Jeffrey Y. Wu Jeffrey Y. Wu Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant RAMBUS INC. -1- RAMBUS INC.'S ADMIN MOT TO FILE UNDER SEAL NOS. 05-00334 RMW; 06-244 RMW; 06-00244 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?