Allen v. Apple, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 7, 2010 AND SCHEDULING A FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 37 ). Case Management Conference set for 5/28/2010 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/6/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michelle L. Roberts - CA STATE BAR NO. 239092 Cassie Springer-Sullivan - CA STATE BAR NO. 221506 SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP 410 - 12th Street, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 992-6130 Facsimile: (510) 280-7564 E-mail: mlr@ssrlawgroup.com css@ssrlawgroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Sean P. Nalty - CA STATE BAR NO. 121253 Shilpa G. Doshi - CA STATE BAR NO. 253024 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 525 Market Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 433-0990 Facsimile: (415) 434-1370 E-mail: sean.nalty@wilsonelser.com shilpa.doshi@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Defendants **E-Filed 5/6/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAURA ALLEN, vs. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C09-04459 JF NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIPULATION AND ---R-------S----- ORDER VACATING [P --OPO - ED] HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 7, 2010 AND SCHEDULING A FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE APPLE INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN; CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, Defendants. TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: WHEREAS, Plaintiff Laura Allen, and Defendants, Apple Inc. Long Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America (incorrectly sued as CIGNA Group Insurance) (collectively, "the Parties"), have agreed to a settlement in principle of all claims and NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C09-04459 JF] Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 causes of action alleged in the above-referenced action; WHEREAS, the Parties are in the process of preparing the settlement documents and anticipate requiring four weeks to finalize and effectuate the terms of the settlement; WHEREAS, the Parties are scheduled to appear for a bench trial on the Parties' motions for judgment on May 7, 2010 at 2:30 p.m.; WHEREAS, in light of the recent settlement in principle, the Parties believe that the bench trial scheduled for May 7, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. should be vacated; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to schedule a further case management conference for May 28, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. to enable the Parties sufficient time to finalize the settlement and dismiss the case with prejudice, or if a settlement cannot be reached, to set a date for a bench trial on the Parties' motions for judgment; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows: The bench trial on the Parties' motions for judgment scheduled for May 7, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. will be vacated; The Parties will appear for a further case management conference on May 28, 2010 at 10:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard by the Court. IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Dated: May 5, 2010 By: SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP /s/ Michelle L. Roberts Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: May 5, 2010 By: WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP /s/ (Authorized on May 5, 2010) Sean Nalty Attorneys for Defendants NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C09-04459 JF] Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5/6/2010 Dated: ______________ ________________________________ Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C09-04459 JF] Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?