Yap et al v. Bank of America, National Association

Filing 10

***FILED IN ERROR, PLEASE DISREGARD*** ORDER RE: 9 CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO 06/13/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/26/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2010) Modified on 3/26/2010 (rslc3, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/29/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John W. Villines (CA SBN 193672) JV LAW 726 14th Street, Suite E Modesto, CA 95354 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 580049 Modesto, CA 95358-0002 Tel: (209) 524-9903 Fax: (209) 524-6655 E-Mail: john@jvlaw.net Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN YAP & IRENE LOKE *E-Filed 03/26/2010* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JOHN YAP, an individual; and IRENE ) CASE NO: 5:09-cv-04639-RS ) LOKE, an individual ) ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) ) BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, ) LP, a subsidiary of BANK OF ) AMERICA, NATIONAL ) ASSOCIATION, a United States Corporation, f.k.a. COUNTRYWIDE ) ) HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; ) THE BANKOF NEW YORK ) MELLON f.k.a. THE BANK OF NEW ) YORK, as Trustee for the ) CERTIFICATEHOLDERS, CWALT, ) INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST ) 2007-OH2 MORTGAGE PASS) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES ) ) 2007-OH2; and DOES 1 10; ) ) ) Defendants. The Case Management Conference was set for April 1, 2010 at 10:00 AM. -1ORDER CONTINUING JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference shall be continued to __________, 2010. * June 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2010 _____________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *At 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3 on the 17th Floor of the United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. -2ORDER CONTINUING JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?