Lahore et al v. SCME Mortgage Banlers,Inc. et al

Filing 36

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Ware on February 25, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Marco Lahore, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 09-04776 JW JUDGMENT United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California SCME Mortgage Banlers, Inc., et al., Defendants. / 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the Court's February 25, 2010 Order Granting in part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate; Declining Supplement Jurisdiction Over Stae Law Claims and Remanding Action to State Court, judgment is entered in favor of DefendantS SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc., Aurora Loan Services LLC, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp., UVC Financial, and Laura Santamaria, against Plaintiffs Marco Lahore and Miriam Maldonaldo as to the following federal claims: (1) Violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601, et seq.; (2) Violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601, et seq.; (3) Violation of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.; and (4) Violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk shall close this file. Dated: February 25, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: David S. Hoffman dshoffmanesq@aol.com Donald Michael Scotten donald.scotten@akerman.com Justin D. Balser justin.balser@akerman.com Michael Patrick Rooney mike@mikerooneylaw.com Dated: February 25, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?