Fitness Anywhere, Inc. v. Yan et al
Filing
106
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 105 OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TIMOTHY SANTOS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/22/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)
*E-Filed 11/22/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
Omid A. Mantashi (SBN 208336)
Attorney at Law
360 Grand Ave., Ste. 90
Oakland, CA 94610
(510) 593-9442 (Voice)
(510) 868-8310 (Fax)
omid@ipfoundry.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
FITNESS ANYWHERE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
vs.
STANLEY YAN, et al.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: CV 09-04815 RS
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
OF DEFENDANT TIMOTHY SANTOS
Hon. Richard Seeborg
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________
22
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
It is hereby certified that on the 22nd day of November, 2011, the foregoing STIPULATION
3
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TIMOTHY SANTOS was filed
4
and served on the following through the Northern District of California ECF system:
5
Defendant Timothy Santos:
Jeffrey Andrew Chen
Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Chen
275 Fifth St., Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94103
jachen@earthlink.net
Defendant Paul Fu:
Jingming James Cai
Schein & Cai LLP
111 W St. John Street, Ste. 1250
San Jose, CA 95113
jcai@sacattorneys.com
Defendant Stan Chin:
Bruce Piontkowski
Tingley Piontkowski LLP
10 Almaden Boulevard, Ste. 430
San Jose, CA 95113
bpiontkowski@tingleyllp.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Omid Mantashi
Omid A. Mantashi
Attorney for Plaintiff
FITNESS ANYWHERE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________
Stip. & Order of Dismissal of Defendant Santos
Case No. CV 09-4815 RS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
Omid
A.
Mantashi,
Attorney
at
Law
360
Grand
Ave.,
Ste.
90
OAKLAND,
CA
94610
510.593.9442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?