Katz v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al

Filing 54

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/7/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2010)

Download PDF
Katz v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al Doc. 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 09-CV-04866-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JONATHAN KATZ, v. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-CV-04866-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. On September 21, 2010, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, dismissing two of Plaintiff's claims with prejudice and granting leave to amend on a third. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint, if any, within 30 days of its order and stated that any late-filed amendments would be subject to dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b). Over two months have passed since the Court's order, and Defendant now requests that the Court dismiss the case with prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed an amended pleading in accordance with the Court's order or sought an extension of time. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 7, 2010 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?