Watts v. Astrue

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/15/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)

1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff /jgl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLAYTON B. WATTS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) Case No: C09-04873 JF ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time of (45) days up through and including Tuesday, June 8, 2010 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by two factors. First, Defendant, while timely filing its answer, encountered a delay in providing the transcript, with the result being that the parties had to stipulate to a first extension of time for Plaintiff's e-filing. [See Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, Docket No. 16, March 5, 2010.] Second, because of this, Counsel's strict internal timetable for

1 STIPULATION AND ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

briefing cases, which is based on the filing date for each, had to be reconfigured. The time requested in this is stipulation is the result of that reconfiguration. JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney

Dated: April 14, 2010

/s/ Timothy R. Bolin
TIMOTHY R. BOLIN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: April 14, 2010

/s/
HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff CLAYTON B. WATTS

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/15/10 HON. JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge

2 STIPULATION AND ORDER